2010
DOI: 10.1080/13674670903384533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asian and female in the white God's world: a qualitative exploration of discrimination in Christian academia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cautions should be taken in applying these findings to more ethnically diverse contexts particularly in light of the complications resulting from the intersection of sexism and racism (e.g., Kim et al, 2010). Additionally, this study's use of both self-report and online collection of data may have influenced the reliability of data collected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cautions should be taken in applying these findings to more ethnically diverse contexts particularly in light of the complications resulting from the intersection of sexism and racism (e.g., Kim et al, 2010). Additionally, this study's use of both self-report and online collection of data may have influenced the reliability of data collected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although studies have shown that religiosity is strongly correlated with gender inequitable attitudes (Seguino, 2011), little research exists on sexual harassment and gender harassment in Christian academia. While a handful of studies have documented gender based discrimination among faculty members at Christian institutions (Christerson, Hall, & Cunningham, in press;Garlett, 1997;Hall, in press;Hall, Christerson, & Cunningham, 2010;Hall, Cunningham, & Christerson, 2008;Ingersoll, 2003;Kim, Anderson, Hall, & Willingham, 2010;Sequeira, Trzyna, Abbott, & McHenry, 1995;Walker, 2001) no research was identified regarding the frequency or the outcomes of gender or sexual harassment in a Christian university student population such as the one used for this study.…”
Section: Sexual Harassment and Gender Harassment In Christian Academiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample was also largely European American. Caution should be taken in applying these findings to more ethnically diverse contexts, particularly in light of the complications resulting from the intersection of sexism and racism (e.g., Kim, Anderson, Hall, & Willingham, in press).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, all data were collected via self-report, which can elicit biases from participants. Another limitation is that this sample was mostly White (59%), and the analysis did not consider the possible nuances relating to the intersectionality of racial/ethnic discrimination with gender discrimination (Buchanan et al, 2009;Kim, Anderson, Hall, & Willingham, 2010). Moreover, while the measure of sexuality policing demonstrated excellent reliability and correlated well with the overall gender harassment measure, it was developed by the authors specifically for use in this study and should be validated in future studies.…”
Section: Limitations and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only one study was found that looked at gender harassment through a lens of race at a Christian university. Using a phenomenological approach, Kim, Anderson, Hall, and Willingham (2010) found that Asian/Asian-American female faculty members at Christian universities across the country were discriminated against not just for being women, but for being Asian women.…”
Section: Religious-based Harassmentmentioning
confidence: 99%