Aşezarea neolitică şi necropola de la Sarichioi, județul Tulcea. Campania 1978. Raport preliminar

Oberländer-Târnoveanu, Ernest; Oberländer-Târnoveanu, Irina

doi:10.3406/mcarh.1979.1433

Cited by 5 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Single finds of gold coins were reported on the Danube limes, or near the Danube -at Dierna (a gold multiple from Gratianus 11 ), at Iatrus 12 (8 issues from the period 375-395, from which four issues belong to the mint of Sirmium, dated 393-395), Remesiana -Bela-Palanka (a solidus from Theodosius I), Viminacium-Kostolac (a solidus from Arcadius), Novae-Cezava (a tremissis from Honorius), Mala Jasikova (a tremissis from Aelia Eudoxia), Paracin-Horeum Margi (a tremissis from Pulcheria), Novacene, Plevna district (two solidi from Arcadius) and at Storgozija, Plevna district (a solidus from Honorius) 13 . The majority of the pieces was issued after the year 378.…”

Section: Single Finds Structuregoldmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Danube Limes and the Barbaricum (294-498 A.D.)

Moisil¹

2002

histoiremesure

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The geographical area with which this study deals is limited to approximately the Romanian sector of the Danube and the Barbaricum territories largely equivalent to the present Romanian territory. This study seeks to analyse the finds of the Barbaricum coins which are in a direct relationship with those provided by the Danubian limes. The analysis of the coin distribution will be made by separating the coins of Limes from the coins of Barbaricum, and also from the coins of the territories that had been previously occupied by the Romans from those that originated in the territories that had never belonged to the Empire. Basically, the territories in Barbaricum separated in this way conform to the historical Romanian regions. We also distinguish a period when the Goths were in the North of the Danube (till 378 and after 378, until the Huns came into the area); with another period, when the area was controlled by the Huns; then a third period which followed the Huns' defeat (after 454). The numismatic material which I consider includes 1,332 bronze coins, 62 silver coins and 67 gold coins that were single finds from Barbaricum, and a number of ca. 5,100 pieces that were provided by the hoards. The Roman Limes of the Danube, from the Iron Gates to the Danube's mouth, furnish approximately 10,000 single coins and about 20,000 coins that were provided by the hoards. The material at the research's disposal is occasionally difficult to analyse, given that it was published, in several cases, without any other specifications except the information concerning the name of the emperor. A more detailed analysis is impossible without a revision of the studies that were published before the '70s. Until this is done, I have used the data as they were published. For Barbaricum, the main source was the register of the finds from the 4th and the 5th centuries which was analysed by V. Butnariu 1. To this register were added the coins which were discovered in this region mentioned in studies published after 1990, and also a series of new finds that are still unpublished. For the The Danube Limes and the Barbaricum (294-498 A.D.) Histoire & mesure, XVII-3/4 | 2002 The Danube Limes and the Barbaricum (294-498 A.D.) The Danube Limes and the Barbaricum (294-498 A.D.) The Danube Limes and the Barbaricum (294-498 A.D.) * 101 The Goths are the only population in the region to which imitation of Roman coins could be assigned although the evidence we have is not sufficient. Coin stricking seems to be common for a population having been in touch with an economy based on pecuniary exchange for a long time and having received an infux of coins as subsidies paid to them The Danube Limes and the Barbaricum (294-498 A.D.

show abstract

Section: Single Finds Structuregoldmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Danube Limes and the Barbaricum (294-498 A.D.)

Moisil¹

2002

histoiremesure

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…La situation de pénurie observée à Drobeta et, surtout, celle à Sucidava doivent plutôt être le résultat du transfert des garnisons locales vers les autres fronts, et de leur remplacement par des fédérés Antes, dont les traces archéologiques ont été retrouvées en plusieurs endroits, au sud d'Olténie et du Banat. La reprise de l'afflux des monnaies pendant les premières années du règne de Héraclius indique que la plus grande partie du territoire des enclaves impériales d'Olténie sont restées sous le contrôle byzantin au début du VII e siècle et que la population locale gardait encore de nombreux traits de civilisation de type provincial, y compris l'usage de la monnaie en bronze 11 .…”

Section: Essor Et Déclin De La Circulation Monétaireunclassified

“…La circulation monétaire en Olténie byzantine nord-danubienne située entre l'Olt et la Cerna. L'usage de la monnaie en bronze y est plus proche du modèle urbain byzantin de Sucidava et Drobeta, alors que dans les places-fortes et les villages en Olténie il ressemble davantage à celui des milieux ruraux des Balkans orientaux 8 . Dans les découvertes monétaires du VI e siècle d'Olténie dominent nettement les pièces en bronze, particulièrement les folles et les 1/2 folles, mais on rencontre également des pièces de moindre valeur faciale, comme, par exemple, celles de 1/4 folles et de 1/8 folles, dont l'apparition est plus fréquente pendant les règnes de Justinien I er et Justin II.…”

unclassified

“…Il faut mentionner que pendant les années 540-541, 549-553 et 560-561, il y a des lacunes également dans l'échantillon monétaire provenant du nord de la Dacie Ripuaire et que pendant les années 539-540, 553-556 et 558-560, la quantité de monnaies retrouvée est très réduite. Tant Drobeta que Sucidava ont connu des grandes difficultés, sinon même des destructions pendant ce règne, et ce fait est clairement illustré par les trouvailles monétaires 9 .…”

unclassified

“…Sur l'ensemble du territoire il y eut un très faible apport pendant les premières années du règne de Héraclius, avant l'arrêt total de la pénétration du nouveau numéraire en bronze vers 614-615. Il faut souligner que les années 614-615 correspondent, d'une manière générale, à l'arrivée de la monnaie en bronze non seulement dans l'enclave byzantine d'Olténie, mais sur presque toute la longueur de la frontière danubienne, de l'Embouchure du Danube aux Portes de Fer 10 .…”

unclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

La monnaie byzantine des vie-viiie siècles au-delà de la frontière du Bas-Danube

Oberländer-Târnoveanu¹

2002

histoiremesure

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Paleoecological data complete historical and archaeological archives: Human–environment nexus at the fluvio maritime city port of Chilia (Licostomo; Northern Danube delta) since the 14th century

Preoteasa,

Hanganu,

Dan

et al. 2023

Geoarchaeology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study reconstructs the paleoecological settings of Chilia/Licostomo, the most important Genoese colony in the Danube delta. Our paleoenvironmental data (i.e., sedimentology, pollen, charcoal, radiocarbon ages) corroborate historical and archaeological information over the last seven centuries to document the habitation at Chilia and its military and socioeconomic activity during ca. 14th–19th centuries A.D. Palynological data show the continuous presence of humans, with anthropogenic pollen index calculation (API) values between 2% and 16% during the last five centuries. The variability of API, corroborated with the major peaks of the charcoal concentration, matches the documented military conflicts and population changes in the area: the Ottoman conquest of Dobrugea (15th century A.D.), the Zaporozhians Cossaks raids (17th century A.D.), and the Russian–Ottoman wars (18th–19th centuries A.D.). The presence of coprophilous fungi fits the Ottoman tradition of animal husbandry, whereas their appearance after the Zaporozhians Cossacks raids and their good correlation with open land vegetation suggest that the Chilia loess island was temporally used as a refuge from multiple menaces (e.g., wars, administrative crisis). These paleoecological data, together with the rare archaeological findings, exclude human habitation of the Chilia Plain earlier than the documented arrival of the Lipovans during the late 18th century A.D. The critical assessment of the correspondences between the paleoecological and historical data shows the relevance of the approach in deltaic environments, when applied to lagoon/lacustrine sediments, yet often limited to chronologically disparate, decennial‐ to multicentennial‐scale temporal frameworks.

show abstract

Aşezarea neolitică şi necropola de la Sarichioi, județul Tulcea. Campania 1978. Raport preliminar

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

The Danube Limes and the Barbaricum (294-498 A.D.)

The Danube Limes and the Barbaricum (294-498 A.D.)

La monnaie byzantine des vie-viiie siècles au-delà de la frontière du Bas-Danube

Paleoecological data complete historical and archaeological archives: Human–environment nexus at the fluvio maritime city port of Chilia (Licostomo; Northern Danube delta) since the 14th century

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About