1970
DOI: 10.1017/s0022149x00021982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asexual Multiplication in Cysticercus pisifortnis (Cestoda)

Abstract: Asexual multiplication in Cysticercus pisifortnis (Bloch, 1780) was first described by Moniez (1880). This observation was refuted by Solomon (1934) as being “erroneous or descriptive of an isolated or abnormal phenomenon”. Several years later, Crusz (1948) confirmed the observations of Moniez (1880). Voge (1967) did not mention asexual reproduction in this species in her review on postembryonic development of cestodes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus, was introduced from the Iberian Peninsula into the Canary Islands (Foronda et al, 2003) and has been reported as an intermediate host of T. pisiformis in Tenerife Island. Both T. parva and T. pisiformis are clearly differentiated at the morphological, biological and phylogeographical levels (Verster, 1969;Opuni, 1970;Casanova et al, 2000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus, was introduced from the Iberian Peninsula into the Canary Islands (Foronda et al, 2003) and has been reported as an intermediate host of T. pisiformis in Tenerife Island. Both T. parva and T. pisiformis are clearly differentiated at the morphological, biological and phylogeographical levels (Verster, 1969;Opuni, 1970;Casanova et al, 2000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6) Uterine branches, two states: do not bifurcate (0), bifurcate (1). ** There are rare reports of asexual division in this species (Crusz, 1948;Opuni, 1970). *** Strobilocercus-a strobilated cysticercus.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The close relationship postulated, however, suggests that such proliferative morphogenesis may be homologous. Interestingly, there are also reports of proliferative budding for T. pisiformis (Crusz, 1948;Opuni, 1970), placed in the T. acinonyxi subclade and as the sister species of T. serialis. In this situation, however, the transverse fission described for T. pisiformis does not appear homologous to the ontogeny of metacestodes in T. crassiceps or T. polyacantha nor to development of the coenurus and other polycephalic forms.…”
Section: Phylogeny and Morphogenesis Of Metacestodesmentioning
confidence: 99%