ASEAN Regionalism and Southeast Asia’s Systemic Challenges

Felker, Greg

doi:10.1057/9780230107175_8

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…102 It is for these reasons that ASEAN has an important role in a changing regional context that 'increasingly embeds interstate rivalries in more complex forms of interdependence and mutual vulnerability.' 103 Its member states recognise the value of redefining threat perceptions and developing new levels of mutual expectation through greater Japan-US-China engagement within the region, as well as through a more conscious application of the region itself. 104 Since its 1992 summit, ASEAN has emphasised economic integration and the search for a greater voice as a grouping, and has become an important focal point for regional concerns, both at the state and sub-state level.…”

Section: Aseanmentioning

confidence: 99%

Strategic regionalism in East Asia

Gilson¹

2007

Rev. Int. Stud.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The US, China and Japan are often portrayed as three giant states dominating the region of East Asia in perpetual potential conflict. This article proposes that such assessments should be tempered in the light of changing regional and global dynamics and, in particular, in view of the growing centrality of the region of East Asia itself for foreign policy agendas. Adopting a framework underpinned by the concept of strategic regionalism, this article focuses upon the developing collective identification of region, and assesses the possibility for joint leadership in East Asia.

show abstract

Section: Aseanmentioning

confidence: 99%