2018
DOI: 10.1108/maj-11-2017-1693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ascribing responsibility for online security and data breaches

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to understand consumer reactions to security breaches and the best approach for companies to minimize the reputational damage that is done. Design/methodology/approach The authors assessed trust in a company following a data breach as well as perceptions of individual and corporate responsibility for data security and also measured individual personality. Findings The authors found that individuals held companies more responsible for protecting private data and held com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of their potential contribution to company susceptibilities to data breaches, individuals often perceive that the onus of responsibility for data security lies solely with an online company or vendor. Vendors that store personal or financial information of consumers have pushed for better online security and reputations for security, which may have had the unintended consequence of false security for consumers (Carré et al, 2018). Further, Carré et al found that following a data breach, individuals are more likely to repudiate the quality of a company, specifically among selfish personality types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of their potential contribution to company susceptibilities to data breaches, individuals often perceive that the onus of responsibility for data security lies solely with an online company or vendor. Vendors that store personal or financial information of consumers have pushed for better online security and reputations for security, which may have had the unintended consequence of false security for consumers (Carré et al, 2018). Further, Carré et al found that following a data breach, individuals are more likely to repudiate the quality of a company, specifically among selfish personality types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors also identified security (continued) Empirical study using regression analysis. Using reported security breaches during the period 2005-2014, results reveal that firms with technology committees are more likely to have reported breaches in a given year than are firms without the committee Carré et al, 2018 Ascribing responsibility for online security and data breaches Exploratory study. The authors reveal that individuals held companies more responsible for protecting private data and held companies even more responsible following a data breach Curtis et al, 2018 Consumer security behaviors and trust following a data breach Exploratory study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abu-Musa (2006) concluded that banks know the threats; their challenge is to overcome them. Carré et al (2018) examined consumer reactions to security breaches and sought the best approach for companies to minimize reputational damage, arguing that "participants viewed companies as being more responsible for data protection and more responsible after a data breach than were individuals" (p. 442). Hence, their findings emphasized that there was no significant difference between participants' perceptions of companies' responsibility to protect data and companies' responsibility for a data breach occurring.…”
Section: Security Threats and Security Breachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of ESG issues can be linked with the telecommunications industry; for instance in environmental scope, on how companies address waste and carbon footprint in their environmental system (Fernandez et al, 2015). As for the social scope, the issues are related to engagement with stakeholders; for instance, health and safety at workplace (Contrafatto and Burns, 2013;Searcy et al, 2012) and protection of customers' personal data (Carre et al, 2018). Meanwhile, in governance scope, the emphasis is on how companies strengthen the roles of Board of Directors and audit monitoring to minimize fraud in business dealings (Chih et al, 2010;Joseph et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%