2006
DOI: 10.1071/ap06046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ascosporic and conidial inoculum ofGibberella zeaeplay different roles in Fusarium head blight and crown rot of wheat in Australia and the USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is an ecological adaptation among the three pathogens that further influence their fitness. Macroconidia, not ascospores, are the main inoculum source for FHB in Australia, and Australian Fg isolates produce fewer perithecia in culture or in the field compared with isolates from the USA (Mitter et al, 2006a). With winter snow covering wheat fields postharvest in the USA, the production of perithecia on crop residues is critical to pathogen survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an ecological adaptation among the three pathogens that further influence their fitness. Macroconidia, not ascospores, are the main inoculum source for FHB in Australia, and Australian Fg isolates produce fewer perithecia in culture or in the field compared with isolates from the USA (Mitter et al, 2006a). With winter snow covering wheat fields postharvest in the USA, the production of perithecia on crop residues is critical to pathogen survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under humid conditions, Fusarium produces conidia on infected stubbles and this can be used to directly measure fecundity. However, the role of conidia in CR infection is relatively minor (Mitter et al , 2006a) and since hyphae growing from infected crop residue are the primary means of infection of crown and stem base tissue (Burgess et al , 2001), pathogen biomass in stubble is an adequate measure of CR inoculum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference in the type of spores trapped was consistent between the two locations (P=0.436 and P=0.435 for the effect of location on numbers of ascospores and conidia, respectively). Prevalence of ascospores is not surprising because maize residues are a favourable substrate for ascospore production (Pereyra and Dill-Macky 2008) and ascospores have been found to be prevalent over conidia in other studies (Fernando et al 2000;Inch et al 2005;Markell and Francl 2003;Mitter et al 2006;Panisson et al 2002). However, F. graminearum survives on a wide range of plant material (Parry et al 1995) and there is limited information on whether the substrate affects the ascospore/conidium production ratio.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%