1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199612)30:6<726::aid-ajim9>3.3.co;2-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asbestos plaques in a typical veteran's hospital population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our no-apparent-exposure group consisted of participants who responded "no" to the exposure pathways listed in the questionnaire and who were likely exposed via ambient air and other pathways not assessed by our screening questionnaire. The rate of 6.7% for the no-apparent-exposure group in our analysis and the rate of 9.1% given by Price in his letter are considerably higher than the prevalence rates of pleural abnormalities found in published studies of other nonoccupationally exposed populations in the United States, which range from 0.2% among bluecollar workers in North Carolina (Castellan et al 1985) to 2.3% among patients at Veterans Affairs hospitals in New Jersey (Miller and Zurlo 1996). Of note, these studies did not exclude family contacts of workers or domestic exposures (Castellan et al 1985;Anderson et al 1979).…”
Section: Radiographic Abnormalitiescontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Our no-apparent-exposure group consisted of participants who responded "no" to the exposure pathways listed in the questionnaire and who were likely exposed via ambient air and other pathways not assessed by our screening questionnaire. The rate of 6.7% for the no-apparent-exposure group in our analysis and the rate of 9.1% given by Price in his letter are considerably higher than the prevalence rates of pleural abnormalities found in published studies of other nonoccupationally exposed populations in the United States, which range from 0.2% among bluecollar workers in North Carolina (Castellan et al 1985) to 2.3% among patients at Veterans Affairs hospitals in New Jersey (Miller and Zurlo 1996). Of note, these studies did not exclude family contacts of workers or domestic exposures (Castellan et al 1985;Anderson et al 1979).…”
Section: Radiographic Abnormalitiescontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Their prevalence is most directly related to duration from first exposure; they are rare within less than 20 years. Pleural plaques consistent with asbestos exposure appear in chest films of 2.3% of U.S. males, a percentage that has been remarkably stable both for the general population in the early 1970s and veterans in the 1990s (94,95).…”
Section: Nonmalignant Pleural Abnormalities Associated With Asbestosmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…General population surveys looking for pleural plaques have shown prevalence rates as high as 6.8%. However, most surveys show rates around 2.5% or less and rates have been found as low as 0.21% . Surveys of exposed populations have shown varying rates of pleural plaques, as high as 49% .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%