1995
DOI: 10.2138/am-1995-11-1201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asbestiform riebeckite (crocidolite) dissolution in the presence of Fe chelators; implications for mineral-induced disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
1
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
33
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 1A, all chelators used in this study except ferrozine mobilized more iron from crocidolite than amosite fibers when compared on the basis of fiber (25). The general trend in iron release for different chelator solutions is in agreement with the literature after consideration of differences in incubation conditions (e.g., fiber and chelator concentrations, chelator solvent, pH, temperature, and time) (8,17,25,34).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in Figure 1A, all chelators used in this study except ferrozine mobilized more iron from crocidolite than amosite fibers when compared on the basis of fiber (25). The general trend in iron release for different chelator solutions is in agreement with the literature after consideration of differences in incubation conditions (e.g., fiber and chelator concentrations, chelator solvent, pH, temperature, and time) (8,17,25,34).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…It is not surprising that the iron content within the surface region is similar for nontreated crocidolite and amosite fibers, as their total iron contents are also similar to each other. However, the Fe/Si ratio of 0.8 measured in this and other recent studies (Gold et al, unpublished data) is significantly higher than the values of approximately 0.6 that we measured on the same fibers in previous years (31) and that were reported by Werner et al (8). Different sample preparation and XPS analysis methods can explain this discrepancy (Gold et al, in preparation).…”
Section: Iron Assodated With Asbestos Fibers After Chelator Treatmentscontrasting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to the obvious adsorption of biomolecules from extracellular fluids and cytoplasm, some ions will be selectively deposited on the particle and others extracted by endogenous chelators. Iron chelators mobilize considerable amounts of iron from some asbestos, which modifies the surface and subsurface layers (44,50,53,(65)(66)(67). Solubility in biological fluids containing molecules or anions that may chelate metal ions e.g., oxalate, phosphate, cysteine is much different from that in pure aqueous solution (66,67).…”
Section: Modification Of the Surface In Vivomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have dealt with the toxicological aspects in vivo and/or in vitro and fiber characterization, trying to understand the reasons of fiber "asbestos", with ideal chemical formula K 2 (Na,Ca 0.5 ) 7 [Al 9 Si 27 O 72 ]¡28H 2 O) fibers from Oregon (USA) and Karlik (Cappadocia, Turkey) [35]. In the chemical formula of erionite, iron may be present only as impurity, nevertheless the large amount of iron-mineral particles lying on erionite surface may contribute to the carcinogenicity of this mineral defined, as proposed by Hill et al, 1990, for the first time, and by IARC, 2012, more carcinogenic than "asbestos" [40,41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%