1969
DOI: 10.2307/3772935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asa and Aramanik: Cushitic Hunters in Masai-Land

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the exact origin of the C-14010 variant in southern Africa is still unknown; the C-14010 variant could have been introduced~1,000 years ago by eastern African Bantu-speaking populations, who could have acquired the variant through admixture with neighboring pastoralist groups. 81,84,[87][88][89][90][91] Alternatively, the presence of the C-14010 variant in southern Africa could have been due to gene flow from eastern Africa prior to the Bantu expansion, corresponding with the archeological record that indicates the presence of cattle in southern Africa (Zambia) as early as 2,400 years ago, 76,92 and subsequent introduction of the C-14010 mutation into South African pastoralist communities. [92][93][94] Indeed, archeological and genetic data suggest that there could have been early admixture between ''Khoe-Khoe'' populations as far north as Zambia and pastoralist populations originating from eastern Africa and then subsequent admixture between the ''Khoe-Khoe'' and other populations in southern Africa.…”
Section: Origins Of the T-13910 Variant In Northern And Central Africmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the exact origin of the C-14010 variant in southern Africa is still unknown; the C-14010 variant could have been introduced~1,000 years ago by eastern African Bantu-speaking populations, who could have acquired the variant through admixture with neighboring pastoralist groups. 81,84,[87][88][89][90][91] Alternatively, the presence of the C-14010 variant in southern Africa could have been due to gene flow from eastern Africa prior to the Bantu expansion, corresponding with the archeological record that indicates the presence of cattle in southern Africa (Zambia) as early as 2,400 years ago, 76,92 and subsequent introduction of the C-14010 mutation into South African pastoralist communities. [92][93][94] Indeed, archeological and genetic data suggest that there could have been early admixture between ''Khoe-Khoe'' populations as far north as Zambia and pastoralist populations originating from eastern Africa and then subsequent admixture between the ''Khoe-Khoe'' and other populations in southern Africa.…”
Section: Origins Of the T-13910 Variant In Northern And Central Africmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NOm. : Zayse bāz-ō "fronte" [Cerulli 1938 III 201] = baz-o "forehead" [Fleming 1969: 25] ||| SCu. : ERift *ba¸a-"face, forehead" [Ehret]: Qwadza baµawa (-dz-) "face" [Ehret 1980 MS: 1], Asa pa¸a (-j-) "face, forehead" [Ehret] (SCu.…”
Section: Om *B-+ Dentalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Semitic, (2) Berber, (3) Ancient Egyptian, (4) Cushitic, (5) Chadic, which was due to Omotic languages having been in his day still classified under West Cushitic until the pioneering studies in the 1970s by H.C. Fleming (1969Fleming ( , 1974Fleming ( , 1976aFleming ( , 1976b and by M.L. Bender (1975), cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%