2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03532.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

As the raven flies: using genetic data to infer the history of invasive common raven (Corvus corax) populations in the Mojave Desert

Abstract: Common raven (Corvus corax) populations in Mojave Desert regions of southern California and Nevada have increased dramatically over the past five decades. This growth has been attributed to increased human development in the region, as ravens have a commensal relationship with humans and feed extensively at landfills and on road-killed wildlife. Ravens, as a partially subsidized predator, also represent a problem for native desert wildlife, in particular threatened desert tortoises (Gopherus agassizii). Howeve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(89 reference statements)
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…F ST values for highly variable markers, such as microsatellites, tend to be lower than estimates for other types of markers (see Hedrick 1999), so an F ST of 0.026 for microsatellites suggests a sizable degree of genetic structuring. In fact, this F ST value at local population level is only slightly lower than that reported for congeneric ravens Corvus corax at landscape scale (0.032), covering the states of California and Nevada (Fleischer et al 2007), providing some indication of effect size. The 'pocket' of dry forest-assigned crows in farmland habitat (site F2) is intriguing and deserves further investigation in future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…F ST values for highly variable markers, such as microsatellites, tend to be lower than estimates for other types of markers (see Hedrick 1999), so an F ST of 0.026 for microsatellites suggests a sizable degree of genetic structuring. In fact, this F ST value at local population level is only slightly lower than that reported for congeneric ravens Corvus corax at landscape scale (0.032), covering the states of California and Nevada (Fleischer et al 2007), providing some indication of effect size. The 'pocket' of dry forest-assigned crows in farmland habitat (site F2) is intriguing and deserves further investigation in future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…'Introduction' section). Previous genetic studies of other corvids have largely attributed finescale structuring to short dispersal distances, strong philopatry and use of patchy habitats (common ravens, F ST 0 0.032, Fleischer et al 2007; Florida scrub jays Aphelocoma coerulescens, F ST 00.074, Coulon et al 2008; see also Haas et al 2009;Tarr and Fleischer 1999). Cooperative breeding, in which young delay dispersal and assist their parents to raise subsequent broods, is one possible mechanism by which genetic differences could accumulate over small geographic scales (McDonald et al 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, along with the high effective sample size and low autocorrelation estimate, suggested the Markov chains reached convergence after a sufficiently long burn-in period and were sampled from the appropriate likelihood space. A generation time of 1 year [26] and a mutation rate of 10 -5 to 10 -4 per generation for birds [84-89] were used to convert divergence time into calendar years. Given the uncertainty in mutation rates, the resultant estimates should be interpreted with caution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of landscape-scale studies have revealed patterns of genetic structure in expanding invasive populations [15], [20]. However, fine-scale patterns are especially likely to differ from larger scale patterns in invasive populations because large-scale patterns may reflect mass (human-mediated) dispersal, while finer scale patterns may reflect natural dispersal [16], [17], [18], [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%