2008
DOI: 10.4064/aa133-1-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artin's conjecture for septic and unidecic forms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He proved that a quintic form over Q p possesses a non-trivial zero if p ≥ 17. For septic and unidecic forms bounds q 0 (7) ≤ 883 and q 0 (11) ≤ 8053 are due to Wooley [13]. In this paper we shall establish q 0 (5) ≤ 9.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…He proved that a quintic form over Q p possesses a non-trivial zero if p ≥ 17. For septic and unidecic forms bounds q 0 (7) ≤ 883 and q 0 (11) ≤ 8053 are due to Wooley [13]. In this paper we shall establish q 0 (5) ≤ 9.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…We are now in a position to find a non-singular zero x 2 for H where x 2 = 0, which, by Lemma 5.10, implies that there is a non-singular zero of F. To do this, we employ a slicing approach, following an idea used by Wooley [27] for the case of degree 7 and 11 forms. In our context Wooley's method enables one to find a non-singular point more efficiently, than if one applied the crude point counting estimates which are currently available for hypersurfaces.…”
Section: Reduced Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, following the work on cubic forms, Birch and Lewis [3] and later Laxton and Lewis [16], respectively, dealt with the cases of forms of degree 5 and later degrees 5, 7 and 11, obtaining a condition on the cardinality of the residue class field. Later work by Leep and Yeomans [18] (degree 5), Knapp [15] (degrees 7 and 11), Wooley [27] (degrees 7 and 11) and most recently Heath-Brown [14] (degree 5) have provided us with bounds for the cardinality of the residue class field that fall narrowly short of the truth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reasonable lower bound for the characteristic required is only known in a handful of cases. For example, recently Wooley [11] has shown that for d = 7 and 11 we require the size of the residue class field to respectively exceed 883 and 8053. These estimates depend on the ability to ascertain the existence of a non-singular point on the F q -varieties under consideration.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%