Artikel Kehormatan: Analisis Hukum Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang

Atmasasmita, Romli

doi:10.22304/pjih.v3n1.a1

Cited by 7 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[13] Knowledge of microeconomic analysis of law is very relevant and important for the legal studies because the legal analysis will acquire new knowledge, which is to consider "cost and benefit ratio" In the formation of laws and law enforcement. [14] Richard Posner asserted that observing an economic perspective on the law create behavioral law or behavioral economy. [15] So in the principle, Posner conveyed that the existence of transaction costs and such components must be accommodated into positive legal rules.…”

Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Discourse of Qanun Aceh Number 11 Year 2018 Concerning Sharia Financial Institutions in the Economic Approach

Hastuti¹,

Pujiyono²,

Harahap³

2021

Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research purposes to discover about the economic point of view of the law in the Policy of Qanun Number 11 year 2018 concerning Sharia FinancialInstitutions in Aceh Province. This research is a prescriptive doctrinal law research. The approach used is a conceptual approach which is the researchers based on the view of experts (expert) in building arguments. In this case, the view of experts that used is the idea of Richard A. Posner as the basic to build an economic approach argumentative to the law. The data analysis technique used is qualitative. The results showed that based on the theory from Posner, the policy of the formulate of the Qanun Sharia Financial Institutions was parallel to the theory of wealth maximization (Wealth Maximization Theory) with the indicator of Article 5 which stated that the objectives of the Qanun include to; encourage increase Aceh Original Revenue; increase the access of funding and business for the community; help the increase of economic empowerment and social productivity; and help the increase of social income and welfare. According to the theory of Cost and Benefit Analysis (CBA) the policy of converting from conventional banks to Sharia banks provide benefits to Sharia banks. Meanwhile according to the theory of Behavioral of Law and Economy analyzed using three approaches namely; a positive approach, it was concluded that the implementation of the Qanun will bring positive results for banking performance improvement and public awareness in carrying out economic activities based on sharia principles will make the level of default risk decreases; the prescription approach for the implementation of the Qanun is to avoid economic activities that are incompatible with Sharia principles; the normative approach confirms the enactment of the Qanun to help increase income and welfare of the society.

show abstract

Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Discourse of Qanun Aceh Number 11 Year 2018 Concerning Sharia Financial Institutions in the Economic Approach

Hastuti¹,

Pujiyono²,

Harahap³

2021

Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Romli Atmasasmita berpendapat secara sosial, politis, dan, yuridis, bangsa Indonesia telah mengakui bahwa korupsi merupakan kejahatan luar biasa (extraordinary crimes) (Atmasasmita, 2016). Tindak pidana korupsi adalah suatu perbuatan melawan hukum yang bertujuan untuk menguntungkan diri sendiri dan dapat mengakibatkan kerugian bagi negara.…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Problematika Izin Penyadapan Dewan Pengawas Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi

Harefa,

Syakina

2022

lexprudentium

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aturan mengenai penyadapan masih tersebar di beberapa undang-undang di mana ketentuan pelaksanaannya pun masih beragam. Di dalam revisi undang-undang KPK telah membentuk sebuah badan pengawas yang disebut dengan Dewan Pengawas. Pembentukan dewan pengawas KPK menuai berbagai kontroversi dalam hal tugas dan kewenangannya dalam mengawasi KPK. Dengan diputusnya permohononan Judicial Review terhadap pasal-pasal baru di dalam revisi Undang-Undang KPK maka kewenangan Dewan Pengawas mengalami pembaharuan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana mekanisme penyadapan dalam pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi dan kewenangan Dewan Pengawas pasca diputusnya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 70/PUU-XVII/2019. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan melalui pendekatan undang-undang (statute approach) yang terkait dan pendekatan konseptual (conseptual approach). Teknik pengumpulan data di dalam penelitian ini melalui studi kepustakaan. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diperoleh kesimpuan bahwa mekanisme penyadapan dalam pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi tidak diatur secara rinci di dalam Undang-Undang KPK. Selain itu kewenengan dewan pengawas dalam hal pemberian izin terlebih dahulu untuk melakukan penyadapan, penggeledahan, dan penyitaan dianggap inkonstitusional. Pemberian kewenangan pro justicia kepada dewan pengawas dianggap sebagai salah satu bentuk intervensi karena dewan pengawas bukanlah aparat penegak hukum. Oleh karena itu kewenangan dewan pengawas dalam hal penyadapan hanyalah sebatas mendapatkan informasi kegiatan penyadapan

show abstract

“…The mandate of social welfare is regulated in Article 33 paragraph (1) of the Constitution, which states that the economy is organized as a joint effort based on the principle of kinship. Furthermore, paragraph (2) states that important production sectors for the state and those which affect the livelihoods of many people shall be controlled by the state. Additionally, paragraph (3) states that land, water, and natural resources contained therein shall be controlled by the state and used for the greatest prosperity of the people (Atmasasmita, 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Furthermore, paragraph (2) states that important production sectors for the state and those which affect the livelihoods of many people shall be controlled by the state. Additionally, paragraph (3) states that land, water, and natural resources contained therein shall be controlled by the state and used for the greatest prosperity of the people (Atmasasmita, 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Principle of Competitive Neutrality for State-Owned Enterprises to an Access to Justice on Business Practices

DHARMA SETIAWAN NEGARA

2023

RLJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research is entitled” Principle of Competitive Neutrality for State-Owned Enterprises to an Access to Justice on Business Practices”. The background of the problem in this dissertation is that business competition conducted by State-Owned Enterprises (SOE’s) against private business actors is not neutral or fair, so it needs to be based on the principle of competitive neutrality. The principle of competitive neutrality is the principle of competition law that companies must compete on the basis of the superiority of their products and may not take undue advantage. In this case the state has a role as regulator and entrepreneur through SOE’s, so that neutral competition is difficult to fulfill without being based on laws and regulations. The formulations of the problem in this dissertation research are: 1) Constitutional basis of state-owned enterprises in national development; 2) Legal principles of competitive neutrality in international legal instruments; 3) Principle of competitive neutrality in national law. Based on Article 1 paragraph (2) juncto Article 33 paragraph (1), paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia that sovereignty is in the hands of the people, production branches which are important to the state and which affect the livelihood of the people at large are controlled by the state and used for the greatest prosperity the people, and most importantly the economy is structured as a joint effort on the principle of kinship, so principles are important as Competitive Neutrality for SOE’s so that they can work together fairly with private business actors.

show abstract

Artikel Kehormatan: Analisis Hukum Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang

Cited by 7 publications

References 0 publications

The Discourse of Qanun Aceh Number 11 Year 2018 Concerning Sharia Financial Institutions in the Economic Approach

The Discourse of Qanun Aceh Number 11 Year 2018 Concerning Sharia Financial Institutions in the Economic Approach

Problematika Izin Penyadapan Dewan Pengawas Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi

Principle of Competitive Neutrality for State-Owned Enterprises to an Access to Justice on Business Practices

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About