1998
DOI: 10.1097/00005392-199806000-00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial Ureteral Replacement for Ureteral Necrosis After Renal Transplantation

Abstract: In select cases of ureteral necrosis after renal transplantation artificial ureteral replacement by subcutaneous pyelovesical bypass offers a possible alternative to open ureteral reconstruction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The nephrovesical bypass is a closed system, and risk of infection is limited. Up to now, no occlusion or encrustation with urine retention has been observed in this system [6,19,20] . In patients with nephrocutaneous bypass, handling of stomal appliances was facilitated, and rehospitalization for nephrostomy exchange was avoided [19] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The nephrovesical bypass is a closed system, and risk of infection is limited. Up to now, no occlusion or encrustation with urine retention has been observed in this system [6,19,20] . In patients with nephrocutaneous bypass, handling of stomal appliances was facilitated, and rehospitalization for nephrostomy exchange was avoided [19] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Die Verbesserung der Lebensqualität ist der wesentliche Aspekt des vorgestellten pyelovesikalen Bypasses [2,3,4,10]. Die Teilnahme an den täglichen und gesellschaftlichen Aktivitäten wird deutlich erleichtert.Das Konduit-System ist für den Patienten leicht zu handhaben und vermeidet unnötige Hospitalisationen zum Wechsel der Nephrostomie [10].…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified
“…Okklusion oder Inkrustationen und damit verbundene Harnstauungen wurden in dem bisher überschaubaren Nachbeobachtungszeitraum nicht beobachtet [2,3,4,10].…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified