2011
DOI: 10.5897/sre11.311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial neural networks for mechanical strength prediction of lightweight mortar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where X is the measured experimental data, X min and X max are the minimum and maximum values of chosen actual data such as stress (σ), strain (ε), strain rate (ε), and deformation temperature (T), respectively, and X N is the normalized data. The experimental values are normalized between more than 0 and less than 0.95, because in the end points, the transfer functions showed a slow learning rate behavior while training the network model [40]. Likewise, data samples (100%) are randomly partitioned into three sets as training set (70%), validation set (15%) and test set (15%) as listed in Table 2 in order to perform the network training process.…”
Section: Flow Stress Modeling Of Aisi-1045 Steel Using An Ann With Bamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where X is the measured experimental data, X min and X max are the minimum and maximum values of chosen actual data such as stress (σ), strain (ε), strain rate (ε), and deformation temperature (T), respectively, and X N is the normalized data. The experimental values are normalized between more than 0 and less than 0.95, because in the end points, the transfer functions showed a slow learning rate behavior while training the network model [40]. Likewise, data samples (100%) are randomly partitioned into three sets as training set (70%), validation set (15%) and test set (15%) as listed in Table 2 in order to perform the network training process.…”
Section: Flow Stress Modeling Of Aisi-1045 Steel Using An Ann With Bamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are in scientific literature many applications of intelligent tools relative to mortars most of them based on artificial neural networks. Thus, artificial neural networks were used to predict compressive strength of mortar: for different cement grades (ESKANDARI et al [2]); for mixtures containing different cement strength classes (ESKANDARI-NADDAF and KAZEMI [3]); containing metakaolin (SARIDEMIR [4]); using different saw waste for sand replacement (MAHZUZ et al [5]); for different scoria percentages instead of sand (RAZAVI et al [6]). Artificial neural networks were also used to predict rubberized mortar properties (TOPÇU and SARIDEMIR [7]), model the influence of salt on desorption isotherm and hygral state of cement mortar (KONIORCZYK and WOJCIECHOWSKI [8]), evaluate sand/cement ratio on mortar using ultrasonic transmission inspection (MOLERO et al [9]) and establish a relationship between microstructural characteristics and compressive strength of cement mortar (ONAL and OZTURK [10]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%