2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2006.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial neural network based prediction of drill flank wear from motor current signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the use of ANNs to classify the state of the tools is widespread because of their adaptive learning, self-organization, fault tolerance and real-time operation, providing good solutions to classifi cation or decision making problems. Examples of ANNs applied to the tool condition classifi cation may be found in Rivero (2008), Mehrabian et al (2008), Patra et al (2007) and Kuljanic et al (2009). Jantunen (2002) reported a summary of methods used to detect breakage and wear of the cutt ing tools, showing that cutt ing forces are commonly used to classify the tool wear, also, this fact may be appreciated in works presented by Kuljanic et al (2005), Rivero et al (2008), Bhatt acharyya et al (2007) and Jemielniak et al (2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of ANNs to classify the state of the tools is widespread because of their adaptive learning, self-organization, fault tolerance and real-time operation, providing good solutions to classifi cation or decision making problems. Examples of ANNs applied to the tool condition classifi cation may be found in Rivero (2008), Mehrabian et al (2008), Patra et al (2007) and Kuljanic et al (2009). Jantunen (2002) reported a summary of methods used to detect breakage and wear of the cutt ing tools, showing that cutt ing forces are commonly used to classify the tool wear, also, this fact may be appreciated in works presented by Kuljanic et al (2005), Rivero et al (2008), Bhatt acharyya et al (2007) and Jemielniak et al (2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TCM systems that are found to be suitable and more reliable for continuous machining operations and research mainly focused on turning operation [5], but they are not accurate for semi or fully-intermittent machining, like grinding or milling [6]. It was found that the process parameters need major tuning for precise detection of tool wear and the estimation of tool life [7]. For effective TCM the chosen parameters are very important and an incorrect choice could lead to a poor response [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jemielniak et al [14] has studied the various signals for vibration, force, and acoustic emission while turning a specific material and extracted some basic features from the different domains such as frequency, time, and time frequency domains of the signals to detect the wear of the tool. Karali Patra [15] has developed artificial neural network based prediction using the motor current signals of drill flank wear. So far very few attempts have been made to generate the online tool wear condition monitoring system using the spindle motor current signal especially in milling machine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%