2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2003.11.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial neural network-based estimation of mercury speciation in combustion flue gases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
25
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…2 indicate the correlation between the actual and predicted values for the three types of mercury speciation when the optimum abductive models derived from Tables 2-4 are evaluated on the full training set of 72 samples in each case. The correlation coefficients range from 0.932 to 0.972 which compare favorably with the value of 0.987 quoted by [13] for a much smaller (13-sample) randomly selected subset of training data. Performance of the three optimum models on the external evaluation set of 10 samples is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Single Abductive Network Models For Mercury Speciationsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…2 indicate the correlation between the actual and predicted values for the three types of mercury speciation when the optimum abductive models derived from Tables 2-4 are evaluated on the full training set of 72 samples in each case. The correlation coefficients range from 0.932 to 0.972 which compare favorably with the value of 0.987 quoted by [13] for a much smaller (13-sample) randomly selected subset of training data. Performance of the three optimum models on the external evaluation set of 10 samples is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Single Abductive Network Models For Mercury Speciationsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Therefore, obtained evaluation results should give a good indication of model performance with new cases under similar prevailing conditions. It would be interesting to see how the abductive network models perform on data for power plants in the ICR scheme other than the 82 plants for which data was given in [13]. As a performance metric, we used the mean absolute error (MAE) defined as the average of the absolute values of the error between the actual and predicted values taken over all the samples considered.…”
Section: Single Abductive Network Models For Mercury Speciationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations