2005
DOI: 10.1007/11553090_66
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial Life Meets Anthropology: A Case of Aggression in Primitive Societies

Abstract: Abstract.One of the greatest challenges in the modern biological and social sciences has been to understand the evolution of altruistic and cooperative behaviors. General outlines of the answer to this puzzle are currently emerging as a result of developments in the evolutionary theories of multilevel selection, cultural group selection, and strong reciprocity. In spite of the progress in theory there is shortage of studies devoted to the connection of theoretical results to the real social systems. This paper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors compare this to cheating. Computational analysis by Burtsev (2005) found that resource supply influences the rate of peaceful cooperation versus aggression. Further, Tanabe and Masuda (2012) argue that RL is able to learn cooperation through natural selection, showing the Baldwin effect.…”
Section: Cooperationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors compare this to cheating. Computational analysis by Burtsev (2005) found that resource supply influences the rate of peaceful cooperation versus aggression. Further, Tanabe and Masuda (2012) argue that RL is able to learn cooperation through natural selection, showing the Baldwin effect.…”
Section: Cooperationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An Agent-based lattice foraging model with possible predator-prey behavior that resembles classical artificial life models [2,3,4] was developed in this work. This model could be considered as modification or replication of Burtsev cellular automata model [5] because of slight difference in their architectures.…”
Section: Objective and Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For experiments in second case, results are divided in situations when agent cannot satisfy himself with resource by staying in one cell permanently and when agents fill all space (Nc -count of cells in environment) but cannot share cell resources with anyone other. For results that respond to third configuration agent count dynamic firstly has behavior of second situation in second configuration and then «switches» to behavior of first situation [3].…”
Section: Model Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations