Artificial Intelligence Techniques That May Be Applied to Primary Care Data to Facilitate Earlier Diagnosis of Cancer: Systematic Review

Abstract

Background More than 17 million people worldwide, including 360,000 people in the United Kingdom, were diagnosed with cancer in 2018. Cancer prognosis and disease burden are highly dependent on the disease stage at diagnosis. Most people diagnosed with cancer first present in primary care settings, where improved assessment of the (often vague) presenting symptoms of cancer could lead to earlier detection and improved outcomes for patients. There is accumulating evidence that artificial intelligence (AI) can assist clinicians in making better clinical decisions in some areas of health care. Objective This study aimed to systematically review AI techniques that may facilitate earlier diagnosis of cancer and could be applied to primary care electronic health record (EHR) data. The quality of the evidence, the phase of development the AI techniques have reached, the gaps that exist in the evidence, and the potential for use in primary care were evaluated. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases from January 01, 2000, to June 11, 2019, and included all studies providing evidence for the accuracy or effectiveness of applying AI techniques for the early detection of cancer, which may be applicable to primary care EHRs. We included all study designs in all settings and languages. These searches were extended through a scoping review of AI-based commercial technologies. The main outcomes assessed were measures of diagnostic accuracy for cancer. Results We identified 10,456 studies; 16 studies met the inclusion criteria, representing the data of 3,862,910 patients. A total of 13 studies described the initial development and testing of AI algorithms, and 3 studies described the validation of an AI algorithm in independent data sets. One study was based on prospectively collected data; only 3 studies were based on primary care data. We found no data on implementation barriers or cost-effectiveness. Risk of bias assessment highlighted a wide range of study quality. The additional scoping review of commercial AI technologies identified 21 technologies, only 1 meeting our inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was not undertaken because of the heterogeneity of AI modalities, data set characteristics, and outcome measures. Conclusions AI techniques have been applied to EHR-type data to facilitate early diagnosis of cancer, but their use in primary care settings is still at an early stage of maturity. Further evidence is needed on their performance using primary care data, implementation barriers, and cost-effectiveness before widespread adoption into routine primary care clinical practice can be recommended.

Artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms for early detection of skin cancer in community and primary care settings: a systematic review

“…This Review comple ments our previous Review on the use of AI/ML techniques applied to electronic health record data in primary care to facilitate the earlier diagnosis of cancer. 18…”

Developing machine learning algorithms for dynamic estimation of progression during active surveillance for prostate cancer

“…There is a growing number of studies on machine learning methods to inform progression risks in cancer and other disease 9 – 11 . There are however relatively fewer studies which have looked at machine learning in predicting future cancer or progression in a surveillance scenario 12 , 13 . A key limitation is usually a lack of standardisation in how and what data is collected and which endpoints are relevant.…”

Harnessing the Electronic Health Care Record to Optimize Patient Safety in Primary Care: Framework for Evaluating e–Safety-Netting Tools

“…The tool creates visual aggregate displays of increased errors (ie, practice dashboards) to establish normative quality standards. It has the ability to self-monitor and self-improve (ie, through artificial intelligence, it improves itself with data and feedback) [11].…”

“…There have been calls to improve the recording of safety-netting to facilitate follow-up and monitoring. More recently, commercial e-safety-netting tools have been developed to assist health care professionals in managing diagnostic uncertainty [9][10][11]. These tools may be integrated within the electronic health record (EHR) or provided by a third-party application.…”