2020
DOI: 10.3233/jad-200888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial Intelligence, Speech, and Language Processing Approaches to Monitoring Alzheimer’s Disease: A Systematic Review

Abstract: Background: Language is a valuable source of clinical information in Alzheimer’s disease, as it declines concurrently with neurodegeneration. Consequently, speech and language data have been extensively studied in connection with its diagnosis. Objective: Firstly, to summarize the existing findings on the use of artificial intelligence, speech, and language processing to predict cognitive decline in the context of Alzheimer’s disease. Secondly, to detail current research procedures, highlight their limitations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
90
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
1
90
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The overwhelming majority of NLP and ML approaches on AD detection from speech are still based on hand-crafted engineering of clinically-relevant features (de la Fuente Garcia et al, 2020). Previous work that focused on automatic AD detection from speech uses certain acoustic features (such as zero-crossing rate, Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients etc.)…”
Section: Domain Knowledge-based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The overwhelming majority of NLP and ML approaches on AD detection from speech are still based on hand-crafted engineering of clinically-relevant features (de la Fuente Garcia et al, 2020). Previous work that focused on automatic AD detection from speech uses certain acoustic features (such as zero-crossing rate, Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients etc.)…”
Section: Domain Knowledge-based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models serve as quick, objective, and non-invasive assessments of an individual's cognitive status which could be developed into more accessible tools to facilitate clinical screening and diagnosis. Since these initial reports, there has been a proliferation of studies reporting classification models for AD based on speech, as described by recent reviews and meta-analyses (Slegers et al, 2018;de la Fuente Garcia et al, 2020;Petti et al, 2020;Pulido et al, 2020), but the field still lacks validation of predictive models on publicly-available, balanced, and standardized benchmark datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, up to the first 14 coefficients are used as they represent the lower range frequencies of the vocal tract and yield most of the information (Hernández-Domínguez et al, 2018). This has been shown to be effective at identifying AD patients in previous literature (Dessouky et al, 2014;Rudzicz et al, 2014;Satt et al, 2014;Fraser et al, 2018;Panyavaraporn and Paramate, 2018;de la Fuente Garcia et al, 2020;Meghanani and Ramakrishnan, 2021). From this new representation, the first 14 coefficients of the MFC are extracted and the mean, variance, skewness and kurtosis are calculated for the energy (static coefficient), velocity (first differential), and acceleration (second differential).…”
Section: Paralinguistic Features (N = 208)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional methodological precautions must be taken to ensure that findings are clinically-valid, generalizable and do not over fit to a single corpus or language. Hence, limitations in current research have been attributed to lacking standardization and comparability between diagnostic settings as well as a growing gulf between how computational features actually model clinically-observable change (de la Fuente Garcia et al, 2020 ). The result being a lack of translation between NLP research and clinical application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 6, averaging proves to be the most effective, while positive linear over performing the negative linear indicates the latter audio chunks are more informative than front ones. Figure 7 includes four biomarkers derived from combining chunk predictions from biomarker models of the three other modules (Cummings, 2019). With more data and longitudinal recordings, the OVBM GNN may incorporate other biomarkers.…”
Section: Ovbm Symbolic Comp M Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%