2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial intelligence prediction of the effect of rehabilitation in whiplash associated disorder

Abstract: The active cervical range of motion (aROM) is assessed by clinicians to inform their decision-making. Even with the ability of neck motion to discriminate injured from non-injured subjects, the mechanisms to explain recovery or persistence of WAD remain unclear. There are few studies of ROM examinations with precision tools using kinematics as predictive factors of recovery rate. The present paper will evaluate the performance of an artificial neural network (ANN) using kinematic variables to predict the overa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, one study reported that artificial neural networks (ANN) (96.9%) resulted in more accurate prediction in 2-year postsurgical satisfaction in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, compared to logistic regression (88.4%) (Azimi et al , 2014). Most ML research in spinal pain have used highly flexible ML models -support vector machine (SVM) (Ashouri et al , 2017, Jiang et al , 2017, Lamichhane et al , 2021, Lee et al , 2019, Silva et al , 2015, and ANN (Fidalgo-Herrera et al , 2020, Hu et al , 2018, Magnusson et al , 1998. However, what constitutes the most important variable or the magnitude of effect each variable has on the prediction remains "hidden" in the ANN model.…”
Section: Contemporary Machine Learning Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, one study reported that artificial neural networks (ANN) (96.9%) resulted in more accurate prediction in 2-year postsurgical satisfaction in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, compared to logistic regression (88.4%) (Azimi et al , 2014). Most ML research in spinal pain have used highly flexible ML models -support vector machine (SVM) (Ashouri et al , 2017, Jiang et al , 2017, Lamichhane et al , 2021, Lee et al , 2019, Silva et al , 2015, and ANN (Fidalgo-Herrera et al , 2020, Hu et al , 2018, Magnusson et al , 1998. However, what constitutes the most important variable or the magnitude of effect each variable has on the prediction remains "hidden" in the ANN model.…”
Section: Contemporary Machine Learning Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physiological data used for prediction in spinal pain ML studies typically consist of temporal (Ashouri, Abedi, 2017, Fidalgo-Herrera, Martínez-Beltrán, 2020, Hu, Kim, 2018, Magnusson, Bishop, 1998, spatial (Lamichhane, Jayasekera, 2021), and spatio-temporal functional variables (Jiang, Luk, 2017). An important pre-processing step in many ML methods is that the variables are required to lie on a scalar domain.…”
Section: Contemporary Machine Learning Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Outro trabalho de (FIDALGO-HERRERA et al, 2020) também utiliza sensores acoplados ao corpo. O método proposto analisa a performance de uma ANN utilizando parâmetros cinemáticos em pacientes com Whiplash Associated Disorders (WAD).…”
Section: Annunclassified