2021
DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2021.1973672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial intelligence models in chronic lymphocytic leukemia – recommendations toward state-of-the-art

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several approaches have been developed for assessing the prognosis of newly diagnosed patients with CLL, although the performance of the predictions has not improved over time. 1 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 A recently developed laboratory-based prognostic calculator demonstrated superior or equal discriminatory power compared with CLL-IPI for TFS across validation cohorts (0.63-0.72 vs 0.61-0.70), with most estimates within the CI of TTFT in our study. 11 The International Prognostic Score-A, a novel score including genetic and clinical variables for predicting TTFT in early-stage CLL, has exhibited C-statistics (0.66-0.75) similar to those of CLL-IPI in direct comparison and with estimates within our CIs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Several approaches have been developed for assessing the prognosis of newly diagnosed patients with CLL, although the performance of the predictions has not improved over time. 1 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 A recently developed laboratory-based prognostic calculator demonstrated superior or equal discriminatory power compared with CLL-IPI for TFS across validation cohorts (0.63-0.72 vs 0.61-0.70), with most estimates within the CI of TTFT in our study. 11 The International Prognostic Score-A, a novel score including genetic and clinical variables for predicting TTFT in early-stage CLL, has exhibited C-statistics (0.66-0.75) similar to those of CLL-IPI in direct comparison and with estimates within our CIs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Assemblage of novel technologies and computational algorithms, however, promises to reduce this breach and help to infer relevant pathophysiological characteristics of rare diseases, such as FA. On the one hand scRNAseq is producing datasets of single cell resolution transcriptional profiles from multiple healthy and diseased tissues, where rare and small populations can be identified 38,39 ; on the other hand, multiple machine learning algorithms exist that can be implemented to identify patterns on these datasets, or that can be trained with labelled datasets for identification of transcriptional profiles of interest in inquiry datasets 7,[40][41][42] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Going forward, the approach of including all available (para) clinical data for the development of predictive models, as employed in CLL-TIM, would eventually allow us to provide decision support based on the prediction of different outcomes during the disease course for individual patients 32 . Consequently, we may be on the right track to identify whom to diagnose with leukemia and whom to diagnose with age-related MBL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%