2023
DOI: 10.3390/bdcc7040178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial Intelligence in the Interpretation of Videofluoroscopic Swallow Studies: Implications and Advances for Speech–Language Pathologists

Anna M. Girardi,
Elizabeth A. Cardell,
Stephen P. Bird

Abstract: Radiological imaging is an essential component of a swallowing assessment. Artificial intelligence (AI), especially deep learning (DL) models, has enhanced the efficiency and efficacy through which imaging is interpreted, and subsequently, it has important implications for swallow diagnostics and intervention planning. However, the application of AI for the interpretation of videofluoroscopic swallow studies (VFSS) is still emerging. This review showcases the recent literature on the use of AI to interpret VFS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By prioritizing and extracting the most relevant information, the algorithm effectively distills the complexity of the images into essential components, facilitating a focused and nuanced analysis of the underlying features. With Keras, we can easily build and experiment with various neural network architectures, including CNNs, using a clear and user-friendly syntax [57], [58], [59].…”
Section: Fig 3 Points Of Difference Between the Female And Male Bodymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By prioritizing and extracting the most relevant information, the algorithm effectively distills the complexity of the images into essential components, facilitating a focused and nuanced analysis of the underlying features. With Keras, we can easily build and experiment with various neural network architectures, including CNNs, using a clear and user-friendly syntax [57], [58], [59].…”
Section: Fig 3 Points Of Difference Between the Female And Male Bodymentioning
confidence: 99%