Artificial Intelligence in Rehabilitation Targeting the Participation of Children and Youth With Disabilities: Scoping Review (Preprint)

Abstract

BACKGROUND In the last decade, there has been a rapid increase in research on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to improve child and youth participation in daily life activities, which is a key rehabilitation outcome. However, existing reviews place variable focus on participation, are narrow in scope, and are restricted to select diagnoses, hindering interpretability regarding the existing scope of AI applications that target the participation of children and youth in a pediatric rehabilitation setting. OBJECTIVE The aim of this scoping review is to examine how AI is integrated into pediatric rehabilitation interventions targeting the participation of children and youth with disabilities or other diagnosed health conditions in valued activities. METHODS We conducted a comprehensive literature search using established Applied Health Sciences and Computer Science databases. Two independent researchers screened and selected the studies based on a systematic procedure. Inclusion criteria were as follows: participation was an explicit study aim or outcome or the targeted focus of the AI application; AI was applied as part of the provided and tested intervention; children or youth with a disability or other diagnosed health conditions were the focus of either the study or AI application or both; and the study was published in English. Data were mapped according to the types of AI, the mode of delivery, the type of personalization, and whether the intervention addressed individual goal-setting. RESULTS The literature search identified 3029 documents, of which 94 met the inclusion criteria. Most of the included studies used multiple applications of AI with the highest prevalence of robotics (72/94, 77%) and human-machine interaction (51/94, 54%). Regarding mode of delivery, most of the included studies described an intervention delivered in-person (84/94, 89%), and only 11% (10/94) were delivered remotely. Most interventions were tailored to groups of individuals (93/94, 99%). Only 1% (1/94) of interventions was tailored to patients’ individually reported participation needs, and only one intervention (1/94, 1%) described individual goal-setting as part of their therapy process or intervention planning. CONCLUSIONS There is an increasing amount of research on interventions using AI to target the participation of children and youth with disabilities or other diagnosed health conditions, supporting the potential of using AI in pediatric rehabilitation. On the basis of our results, 3 major gaps for further research and development were identified: a lack of remotely delivered participation-focused interventions using AI; a lack of individual goal-setting integrated in interventions; and a lack of interventions tailored to individually reported participation needs of children, youth, or families.

Keeping social distance in a classroom while interacting via a telepresence robot: a pilot study

“…Controlling a TPR and providing the TP with a mimicked environment require wireless internet connection and a computer or a smart device (Takeuchi et al, 2020;Kaelin et al, 2021), where the mimicked environment is created with the help of the computer's screen and speakers. At the same time, the camera and microphone of the TP's computer are used to project the TP's face and audio onto the TPR's screen and speakers, allowing the on-site persons to communicate with the TP face-to-face, supporting the TP's presence in the real-world environment (Perez, 2020).…”

Higher education personnel’s perceptions about telepresence robots

“…Thus, although the functions of TPRs vary depending on their type, they generally include the following features: 1) twoway audio communication with others in remote locations; 2) one-way or two-way video screens; 3) movement of the robot by the operator; 4) mobility control of the hands and headequivalent parts; and 5) wireless internet connection (Takeuchi et al, 2020;Kaelin et al, 2021).…”