2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
60
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…With the development of computer science and computational technologies, automatic, adaptive, and efficient AI technologies have been widely applied in various academic fields. Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd), as an interdisciplinary field, emphasizes applying AI to assist instructor's instructional process, empower student's learning process, and promote the transformation of educational system (Chen et al, 2020;Holmes et al, 2019;Hwang et al, 2020;Ouyang & Jiao, 2021). First, AIEd has potential to enhance instructional design and pedagogical development in the teaching processes, such as accessing students' performance automatically (Wang et al, 2011;Zampirolli et al, 2021), monitoring and tracking students' learning (Berland et al, 2015;Ji & Han, 2019), and predicting at-risk students (Hellings & Haelermans, 2020;Lamb et al, 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of computer science and computational technologies, automatic, adaptive, and efficient AI technologies have been widely applied in various academic fields. Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd), as an interdisciplinary field, emphasizes applying AI to assist instructor's instructional process, empower student's learning process, and promote the transformation of educational system (Chen et al, 2020;Holmes et al, 2019;Hwang et al, 2020;Ouyang & Jiao, 2021). First, AIEd has potential to enhance instructional design and pedagogical development in the teaching processes, such as accessing students' performance automatically (Wang et al, 2011;Zampirolli et al, 2021), monitoring and tracking students' learning (Berland et al, 2015;Ji & Han, 2019), and predicting at-risk students (Hellings & Haelermans, 2020;Lamb et al, 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This shows that errors occur in the learning process (Altun-Yalçn et al, 2011;Helms, 2014). Teachers still use a paradigm in teaching, namely teachers dominate the learning process so that in the learning process they still use conventional methods with students only coming, sitting, listening to the material after returning home, even though in the industrial revolution 4.0 people have proven the quality of modern learning, one of which is artificial intelligence methods and digital learning (Audunson & Shuva, 2016;Ouyang & Jiao, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to address the issue is to deliberately choose the student data that are underpinned by a learning theory in order to reflect the specific learning process. Because one of the goals of the performance prediction models is to optimize student-centered learning pathways, the choice of students' input data should be guided by the student-centered learning principle and reflect the student-centered learning processes (Ouyang & Jiao, 2021). There are emerging studies that focus on using online learning behavior data from the process-oriented perspective to accurately predict academic performance, rather than merely using student information data (e.g., demographics) or performance data (e.g., final grades) (Bernacki et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%