2021
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11030514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial Intelligence in Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis Using Clinical Data: Non-Invasive Approach

Abstract: Colorectal cancer is the third most common and second most lethal tumor globally, causing 900,000 deaths annually. In this research, a computer aided diagnosis system was designed that detects colorectal cancer, using an innovative dataset composing of both numeric (blood and urine analysis) and qualitative data (living environment of the patient, tumor position, T, N, M, Dukes classification, associated pathology, technical approach, complications, incidents, ultrasonography-dimensions as well as localization… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are strongly related to the authors' research in the area of cancer diagnosis and prevention [31,32].…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…These results are strongly related to the authors' research in the area of cancer diagnosis and prevention [31,32].…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…The next step in the research is to include in the diagnosis system the results obtained in [ 46 ] by the authors, the computer-aided diagnosis system using an innovative dataset composing of both numeric (blood and urine analysis) and qualitative data (living environment of the patient, tumour position, T, N, M, Dukes classification, associated pathology, technical approach, complications, incidents, ultrasonography-dimensions as well as localisation).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only the P activations are useful features for differentiating images of different classes. For the < 5-year class, the relatively most P (brightest) patches on the 8 × 8 grids are (3,5) in Figure 3A, (7,3) in Figure 3B, (8,6) in Figure 3C, and (3, 5) and (6, 1) in Figure 3D. For the > 5-year class, the relatively brightest patches on the 8 × 8 grids are (7,3) in Figure 3E, (7,3) in Figure 3F, (7,3) in Figure 3G, (7,3) in Figure 3H, (7,3) in Figure 3I, (3,5) and (6,7) in Figure 3J, and (3, 5) in Figure 3K.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the < 5-year class, the relatively most P (brightest) patches on the 8 × 8 grids are (3,5) in Figure 3A, (7,3) in Figure 3B, (8,6) in Figure 3C, and (3, 5) and (6, 1) in Figure 3D. For the > 5-year class, the relatively brightest patches on the 8 × 8 grids are (7,3) in Figure 3E, (7,3) in Figure 3F, (7,3) in Figure 3G, (7,3) in Figure 3H, (7,3) in Figure 3I, (3,5) and (6,7) in Figure 3J, and (3, 5) in Figure 3K. Although the spatial distribution of P activations in the IHC images of < 5 years are different from those of the ones of > 5 years, no consistency of locations of the relatively brightest patches can be found among the 4 IHC images of the < 5-year class.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation