2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10741-022-10283-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial intelligence enabled ECG screening for left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a systematic review

Abstract: Screening for left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), defined as reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), deserves renewed interest as the medical treatment for the prevention and progression of heart failure improves. We aimed to review the updated literature to outline the potential and caveats of using artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography (AIeECG) as an opportunistic screening tool for LVSD. We searched PubMed and Cochrane for variations of the terms "ECG," "Heart Failure," "s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(107 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 5–9 However, independent external validation is not available for all of the published models. 10 , 11 A high variance of performance results for external validation studies reflects both the necessity and difficulty of such analyses, which are influenced by the setting of model application. 12 Validating an algorithm in an unrelated patient population by a different group of researchers is necessitated to prove its reliability and overcome possible systematic bias.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 5–9 However, independent external validation is not available for all of the published models. 10 , 11 A high variance of performance results for external validation studies reflects both the necessity and difficulty of such analyses, which are influenced by the setting of model application. 12 Validating an algorithm in an unrelated patient population by a different group of researchers is necessitated to prove its reliability and overcome possible systematic bias.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While neural network-based models have previously been designed to detect prevalent systolic dysfunction or HF, [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] our study suggests the role of an AI-ECG model as a biomarker for new-onset HF. This AI-based approach can enable opportunistic HF screening for patients undergoing clinical ECGs and also facilitate population-based screening approaches for HF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…[11][12][13]21 Recently, artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced interpretation of electrocardiograms (ECGs; AI-ECG) has been proposed to detect hidden cardiovascular disease signatures from 12-lead ECGs. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] However, these deep learning models have focused on the cross-sectional detection of prevalent systolic dysfunction or HF, [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] with limited application in predicting incident HF. 27,29,35,36 Moreover, most current approaches use raw ECG voltage data as inputs, inaccessible to clinicians and patients at the point-of-care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applications of deep learning for ECGs have demonstrated the ability to identify subtle signatures of structural heart disorders previously considered electrically silent, [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] with applications extending to detecting LVSD from single-lead tracings. 20,[49][50][51] Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration also granted clearance to an AI tool using electronic stethoscope-based single-lead ECGs for cross-sectional LVSD detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%