2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07355-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial intelligence bot ChatGPT in medical research: the potential game changer as a double-edged sword

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
109
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
109
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We searched MEDLINE on March 4, 2023, using the combination of the following two terms: ChatGPT AND Sport. Only two editorials were found [ 23 , 24 ]. The use of ChatGPT in academic research, including sports science, has both advantages and disadvantages that are not fundamentally different from other academic fields.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We searched MEDLINE on March 4, 2023, using the combination of the following two terms: ChatGPT AND Sport. Only two editorials were found [ 23 , 24 ]. The use of ChatGPT in academic research, including sports science, has both advantages and disadvantages that are not fundamentally different from other academic fields.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, banning ChatGPT from scientific writing is not easily enforceable, since ChatGPT is trained to produce human-like texts that even scientists and specifically-trained AI detector sometimes fail to detect [29, 7]. In short, even though the prospect is promising [92, 25, 43, 102], new regulations and substantial improvements are needed before ChatGPT can be safely and widely used for scientific writing, publishing, or medical research in general [105]. The scenario column in Table 1 corresponds to the taxonomy categorization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are concerns about the ability of current plagiarism checkers in journal Editorial Managers to detect instances of plagiarism resulting from the use of ChatGPT. These tools may not be adequate or sensitive enough to identify such instances of plagiarism caused by chatbots [ 25 ]. New and innovative methods for detecting AI usage are required and need to be introduced [ 26 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%