Artificial intelligence assistants and risk: framing a connectivity risk narrative

Abstract

Our social relations are changing, we are now not just talking to each other, but we are now also talking to artificial intelligence (AI) assistants. We claim AI assistants present a new form of digital connectivity risk and a key aspect of this risk phenomenon relates to user risk awareness (or lack of) regarding AI assistant functionality. AI assistants present a significant societal risk phenomenon amplified by the global scale of the products and the increasing use in healthcare, education, business, and service industry. However, there appears to be little research concerning the need to not only understand the risks of AI assistant technologies but also how to frame and communicate the risks to users. How can users assess the risks without fully understanding the complexity of the technology? This is a challenging and unwelcome scenario. AI assistant technologies consists of a complex eco-system and demands explicit and precise communication in terms of communicating and contextualising the new digital risk phenomenon. The paper then agues for the need to examine how to best to explain and support both domestic and commercial user risk awareness regarding AI assistants. To this end, we propose the method of creating a risk narrative which is focused on temporal points of changing societal connectivity and contextualised in terms of risk. We claim the connectivity risk narrative provides an effective medium in capturing, communicating, and contextualising the risks of AI assistants in a medium that can support explainability as a risk mitigation mechanism.

Marketing bank services to financially vulnerable customers: evidence from an emerging economy

“…Firstly, banks need to better understand their customers through appropriate consumer engagement with technologies like mobile phones, USSD transactions and MMA transactions (Dwivedi et al , 2019) in order to develop a product that can appeal to them. The significant amount of data being generated and the increased use of mobile devices and USSD, both present an opportunity for banks to introduce artificial intelligence into their services to better understand their current and prospective consumers (Cunneen et al , 2019).…”

Ethical AI for Automated Bus Lane Enforcement

“…While bus lane enforcement helps to mitigate risks such as those associated with the environment, social inequality and congestion, it can simultaneously create new risks. These are complex socio-technical risks that cross several socio-economic contexts and can be classified into technical, governance, public perception and legal categories [16,17].…”

“…According to Cunneen et al [16,17,23,24], the deployment of an emerging technology creates many complex challenges for governance regimes. Governance risk is exacerbated by a lack of clarity about what the best forms of governance are for AI applications, such as automated bus lane enforcement.…”

Creating ethics guidelines for artificial intelligence and big data analytics customers: The case of the consumer European insurance market

“…9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 We have also had interventions from those members concerned over the consequences of the roll-out of this new technology for vulnerable groups and for the possible impacts in terms of financial inclusion. 11 There are also broader concerns in the research domain speaking to the commercial use applications of user data and the tensions with privacy concerns, 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 profiling, 11 , 18 and user perception. 19 There have also been extensive debates on the potential for opacity in these novel risk assessment techniques and the need to aim for explainability.…”

“…Notions of rights, agency, consent, surveillance, privacy, and human autonomy remain to the fore. 14 , 15 , 16 , 52 , 66 , 67 There is also a growing discourse around the risks relating to how populous scales of adoption concerning data and machine intelligence applications introduce further downstream unknowns such as societal and behavioral impacts relating to "design-based control." 16 , 68 , 69 …”