Artificial intelligence and the future of psychiatry: Qualitative findings from a global physician survey

Abstract

Background The potential for machine learning to disrupt the medical profession is the subject of ongoing debate within biomedical informatics. Objective This study aimed to explore psychiatrists’ opinions about the potential impact innovations in artificial intelligence and machine learning on psychiatric practice Methods In Spring 2019, we conducted a web-based survey of 791 psychiatrists from 22 countries worldwide. The survey measured opinions about the likelihood future technology would fully replace physicians in performing ten key psychiatric tasks. This study involved qualitative descriptive analysis of written responses (“comments”) to three open-ended questions in the survey. Results Comments were classified into four major categories in relation to the impact of future technology on: (1) patient-psychiatrist interactions; (2) the quality of patient medical care; (3) the profession of psychiatry; and (4) health systems. Overwhelmingly, psychiatrists were skeptical that technology could replace human empathy. Many predicted that ‘man and machine’ would increasingly collaborate in undertaking clinical decisions, with mixed opinions about the benefits and harms of such an arrangement. Participants were optimistic that technology might improve efficiencies and access to care, and reduce costs. Ethical and regulatory considerations received limited attention. Conclusions This study presents timely information on psychiatrists’ views about the scope of artificial intelligence and machine learning on psychiatric practice. Psychiatrists expressed divergent views about the value and impact of future technology with worrying omissions about practice guidelines, and ethical and regulatory issues.

Exploring healthcare professionals’ perceptions of artificial intelligence: Validating a questionnaire using the e-Delphi method

“…31 Jha et al 31 developed a survey instrument to measure American physicians' perceptions about the impact of health information systems on primary care delivery, and found that physicians were sceptical about its ability to perform better than humans. A qualitative study measuring psychiatrists perceptions of AI role replacement, 32 found that their views were divergent about the value and impact of AI, but that it would never replace the relational aspects of psychiatric care. Laı¨et al 33 used a qualitative approach to study physicians' perceptions of AI, and found that they share concerns about the management of data, the development of knowledge, the upheaval of the doctor-patient relationship, and the disruption of the diagnosis and decision-making landscape.…”

US Primary Care in 2029: A Delphi Survey on the Impact of Machine Learning

“…In qualitative research a common prediction among physicians is that, by liberating health professionals from administrative tasks, AI/ML will indirectly facilitate more time with patients thereby enhancing levels of empathy. (11,15) Survey research also indicates skepticism among physicians that AI/ML will be able to directly substitute for, or augment clinicians, in the provision of empathic care. (10–12,15)…”

“…(11,15) Survey research also indicates skepticism among physicians that AI/ML will be able to directly substitute for, or augment clinicians, in the provision of empathic care. (10–12,15)…”

Machine Learning in Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy Education: A Mixed Methods Pilot Survey of Postgraduate Students at a Swiss University

“…Considering these digital advances, educating future clinicians, including psychologists and psychotherapists, will be important to ensure optimal, safe use of AI/ML enabled tools and innovations. So far, a growing number of investigations have explored the views of clinicians including primary care physicians on the impact of AI/ML tools on their job (3)(4)(5)(6)(7). These studies, albeit limited, suggest that mental health clinicians expect AI/ML to influence or change their professional roles in the future.…”