2020
DOI: 10.1002/cpt.1951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial Intelligence and Mechanistic Modeling for Clinical Decision Making in Oncology

Abstract: The amount of “big” data generated in clinical oncology, whether from molecular, imaging, pharmacological, or biological origin, brings novel challenges. To mine efficiently this source of information, mathematical models able to produce predictive algorithms and simulations are required, with applications for diagnosis, prognosis, drug development, or prediction of the response to therapy. Such mathematical and computational constructs can be subdivided into two broad classes: biologically agnostic, statistic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 147 publications
(184 reference statements)
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With many effective therapies now available, it has become more and more difficult to determine the optimal combinatorial treatments and schedules, resulting in an unprecedented number of failed clinical trials over the past few years [ 38 , 39 ]. Mathematical modeling has rapidly evolved and could provide relevant tools in oncology [ 40 , 41 ]. Indeed, preclinical and clinical trials in which mathematical models have been used to estimate the mechanism(s) of treatment failure and explore alternative strategies with new drugs and schedules showed their potential to improve therapeutic efficacy [ 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With many effective therapies now available, it has become more and more difficult to determine the optimal combinatorial treatments and schedules, resulting in an unprecedented number of failed clinical trials over the past few years [ 38 , 39 ]. Mathematical modeling has rapidly evolved and could provide relevant tools in oncology [ 40 , 41 ]. Indeed, preclinical and clinical trials in which mathematical models have been used to estimate the mechanism(s) of treatment failure and explore alternative strategies with new drugs and schedules showed their potential to improve therapeutic efficacy [ 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With many effective therapies now available, it becomes more and more difficult to determine the optimal combinatorial treatments and schedules resulting in an unprecedented number of failed clinical trials over the past few years (28,29). Mathematical modeling has rapidly evolved and could provide relevant tools in oncology (30,31). Indeed, clinical trials in which mathematical models have be used to estimate the mechanism(s) of treatment failure and explore alternative strategies with new drugs and schedules showed the potential of mathematical modeling to improve patient outcomes (32)(33)(34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as has been discussed in the setting of cancer immunotherapy, personalized disease trajectory models have the potential to bridge to therapeutics as they can enable response-adaptive treatment decisions for individual patients through iterative development and validation of patient-specific models using baseline and on-treatment biomarker and response data collected longitudinally during treatment (55). Given the multi-dimensional nature of such biomarker measurements in oncology as well as other diseases, convergence and synergy across methodologies ranging from mechanism-based (e.g., QSP) models to biologically agnostic (e.g., ML) models will be necessary (56).…”
Section: Patientmentioning
confidence: 99%