Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property Protection in Indonesia and Japan

Saputra, Rian; Tiolince, Tiara; Iswantoro, Iswantoro; Sigh, Sanju Kumar

doi:10.53955/jhcls.v3i2.69

Cited by 9 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Indonesia's 2020 Roadmap for AI Development and Implementation underscores its ambition to be a global AI leader. The roadmap highlights similar themes of nurturing AI talent, research and development, AI adoption, and ethical AI development [124,125]. The Middle East, too, is witnessing rapid AI growth, with Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Israel at the forefront.…”

Section: Perspectivementioning

confidence: 95%

Managing the race to the moon: Global policy and governance in Artificial Intelligence regulation—A contemporary overview and an analysis of socioeconomic consequences

Walter

2024

Discov Artif Intell

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper delves into the complexities of global AI regulation and governance, emphasizing the socio-economic repercussions of rapid AI development. It scrutinizes the challenges in creating effective governance structures amidst the AI race, considering diverse global perspectives and policies. The discourse moves beyond specific corporate examples, addressing broader implications and sector-wide impacts of AI on employment, truth discernment, and democratic stability. The analysis focuses on contrasting regulatory approaches across key regions—the United States, European Union, Asia, Africa, and the Americas and thus highlighting the variations and commonalities in strategies and implementations. This comparative study reveals the intricacies and hurdles in formulating a cohesive global policy for AI regulation. Central to the paper is the examination of the dynamic between rapid AI innovation and the slower pace of regulatory and ethical standard-setting. It critically evaluates the advantages and drawbacks of shifting regulatory responsibilities between government bodies and the private sector. In response to these challenges, the discussion proposes an innovative and integrated regulatory model. The model advocates for a collaborative network that blends governmental authority with industry expertise, aiming to establish adaptive, responsive regulations (called “dynamic laws”) that can evolve with technological advancements. The novel approach aims to bridge the gap between rapid AI advancements in the industry and the essential democratic processes of law-making.

show abstract

Section: Perspectivementioning

confidence: 95%

Managing the race to the moon: Global policy and governance in Artificial Intelligence regulation—A contemporary overview and an analysis of socioeconomic consequences

Walter

2024

Discov Artif Intell

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Intellectual property value can be realized through creative activities or human experiences (Kim & Jung, 2022). The World Trade Organization (WTO) defines intellectual property rights as exclusive rights that are given to a person for the labor of his mind for a specified time duration (Saputra et al, 2023). Intellectual property refers to property rights owned by an individual over his created achievements.…”

Section: Intellectual Property Rightsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The principles governing intellectual property rights are the principle of natural fairness, the argument from cultural necessity, and the consensus reached by society. These principles were developed to balance individual interests and societal interests (Saputra et al, 2023).…”

Section: Intellectual Property Rightsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Intellectual Property Rights and Plagiarism in Information Technology Research

Mony,

Ikoha

2024

JLS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In present times, intellectual property rights are the central focus of international economies and global market competitions among enterprises due to their important role in fostering cultural prosperity, economic development, and progress in the field of information technology. The advancement in information technology has made the field even more complicated as firms struggle to protect their copyrights in the face of online data explosion, dynamic e-commerce environment, and rising disruptive technologies such as Machine learning and Artificial Intelligence. On the other hand, plagiarism is on the rise in recent times. Students knowingly or unknowingly practice plagiarism daily to meet their stringent academic demands. Information Technology Tools encouraging plagiarism have further aggravated the problem. Intellectual property rights and plagiarism awareness are relatively weak even among scholars. Do intellectual property rights protection and existing plagiarism trends have any effect on the field of information technology research? This paper discusses intellectual property rights and plagiarism with the mindset of information technology research. The paper seeks to shed light on aspects of intellectual property rights and how they affect academic research, in the field of information technology. If after reading this paper a researcher, can take intellectual property rights and plagiarism seriously, then, this research would have achieved its desired outcome.

show abstract

“…Consequently, advancements in these five domains constitute a progression in educational technology within the context of Indonesia. 35 Similar to other domains, the integration of educational technology into Islamic education is crucial. The implementation of educational technology, according to Waghid, could enrich and enliven Islamic education.…”

Section: Muslim Countries Decentralized Education Technology Governan...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Can Indonesia's Decentralized Education Technology Governance Policy: Evidence from Muslim Countries

Thoha,

Syawqi,

Yahaya

et al. 2023

BESTUUR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

<div><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="left"><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="top"><p>Decentralization of education policies has been implemented in Indonesia and Malaysia; however, their potential impact on Islamic education technology innovation remains to be seen. Comparing and contrasting the Education Decentralization Policies of Malaysia and Indonesia is the objective of this study. This is normative legal research derived from tertiary, primary, and secondary legal sources. First, decentralization policies for the development of Islamic education technology are complicated, according to the research findings, because the Ministry of Education and Culture and the Ministry of Religion have a dualism of regulation and management that violates the concepts and spirit of regional autonomy. Second, regulatory dualism affects the quality of education in Indonesia, whereas integrated management is implemented in a single institution for education in Malaysia. Thirdly, Malaysia has endeavored since elementary school to integrate science and technology. Over the past decade, the Indonesian central government has implemented the Madrasah Reform program, among other initiatives and developments, to develop IT-based Islamic education.</p></td></tr></tbody></table></div>

show abstract

Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property Protection in Indonesia and Japan

Cited by 9 publications

References 29 publications

Managing the race to the moon: Global policy and governance in Artificial Intelligence regulation—A contemporary overview and an analysis of socioeconomic consequences

Managing the race to the moon: Global policy and governance in Artificial Intelligence regulation—A contemporary overview and an analysis of socioeconomic consequences

Intellectual Property Rights and Plagiarism in Information Technology Research

Can Indonesia's Decentralized Education Technology Governance Policy: Evidence from Muslim Countries

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About