Artificial Intelligence in Behavioral and Mental Health Care 2016
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-420248-1.00007-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial Intelligence and Human Behavior Modeling and Simulation for Mental Health Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…behavioral (attitude toward a behavior), normative (subjective norms) and control (PBC). Therefore, INT is assumed to be an immediate predictor of behavior (Silverman et al, 2016;Cronce and Larimer, 2013). Previous empirical studies have extensively applied TPB in targeting intentions as a means to alter behaviors by designing interventions strategies to discontinue addictive behaviors (Pelling and White, 2009;Conner, 2015) in a variety of contexts such as smoking cessation (Ruslan et al, 2018;Zhao et al, 2018;Su et al, 2015), risky sexual behaviors (Moeini et al, 2016), excessive use of social network sites (Ho et al, 2017), alcohol consumption (Haydon et al, 2017), abusive relationships (Edwards et al, 2017), cyberbullying (Heirman and Walrave, 2012), internet gambling (Flack and Morris, 2015), risky sexual behaviors (Moeini et al, 2016) and the discontinuance of social media addiction (Luqman et al, 2018).…”
Section: Theory Of Planned Behavior and Behavioral Intentionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…behavioral (attitude toward a behavior), normative (subjective norms) and control (PBC). Therefore, INT is assumed to be an immediate predictor of behavior (Silverman et al, 2016;Cronce and Larimer, 2013). Previous empirical studies have extensively applied TPB in targeting intentions as a means to alter behaviors by designing interventions strategies to discontinue addictive behaviors (Pelling and White, 2009;Conner, 2015) in a variety of contexts such as smoking cessation (Ruslan et al, 2018;Zhao et al, 2018;Su et al, 2015), risky sexual behaviors (Moeini et al, 2016), excessive use of social network sites (Ho et al, 2017), alcohol consumption (Haydon et al, 2017), abusive relationships (Edwards et al, 2017), cyberbullying (Heirman and Walrave, 2012), internet gambling (Flack and Morris, 2015), risky sexual behaviors (Moeini et al, 2016) and the discontinuance of social media addiction (Luqman et al, 2018).…”
Section: Theory Of Planned Behavior and Behavioral Intentionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intention can mean aim, goal or plan. Intention or instrumentality refers to the belief that the behavior will lead to the intended outcome (Silverman et al, 2016). Intentions are supposed to capture the motivational factors that influence a behavior where they indicate how hard people are willing to try and how much effort they plan to make to perform the behavior.…”
Section: Intentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explore the philosophical and ethical issues, we focus on three broad themes, namely detection, diagnosis, and treatment, leaving aside research and clinical administration even if they occasionally overlap with our themes. These themes have been prominent also in earlier reviews of AI technologies applied to mental health 6‐9 . However, as our considerations are philosophical and ethical in nature, they extend and differ to a degree with the main results of the existing literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…These themes have been prominent also in earlier reviews of AI technologies applied to mental health. [6][7][8][9] However, as our considerations are philosophical and ethical in nature, they extend and differ to a degree with the main results of the existing literature. Specifically, we consider how these technologies raise novel and unique philosophical questions for detection, diagnosing and treatment of mental health disorders and further evaluate whether these carry novel ethical implications that are AI-specific and need be taken into account in implementation in this kind of setting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%