2022
DOI: 10.1111/jbi.14543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial Hotspot Occurrence Inventory (AHOI)

Abstract: Aim: Species occurrence records are essential to understanding Earth's biodiversity and addressing global environmental issues, but do not always reflect actual locations of occurrence. Certain geographical coordinates are assigned repeatedly to thousands of observation/collection records. This may result from imperfect data management and georeferencing practices, and can greatly bias the inferred distribution of biodiversity and associated environmental conditions. Nonetheless, these 'biodiverse' coordinates… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As precise locality data are not available for the majority of historic specimen records ( 52 , 53 ), we used county as our geographical unit of analysis. For each county and year, we calculated the mean of each climatic variable and assigned these values to each specimen ( 4 , 9 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As precise locality data are not available for the majority of historic specimen records ( 52 , 53 ), we used county as our geographical unit of analysis. For each county and year, we calculated the mean of each climatic variable and assigned these values to each specimen ( 4 , 9 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last submodule corresponds to the examination and eventual validation of outliers, and it is based on the distributional information of the species (native range or spatial extension) or the environmental range or values that this species occupies. Outliers must not be arbitrarily removed from the data without evidence that they actually resulted from an error (Park et al., 2022). Geographic estimates of certainty and data coverage are calculated individually for each of the created submodules.…”
Section: Information Included In Each Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final module accounts for duplicate information, one of the main issues of using occurrence records from public repositories (Feng et al., 2022; Park et al., 2022). This problem increases when researchers combine multiple repositories to create their data sets due to duplicities published in various sources (Chapman, 2005).…”
Section: Information Included In Each Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unsurprisingly, the biodiversity data compiled by different and uncoordinated initiatives (Feng et al., 2022) are almost always characterized by the pervasive existence of taxonomical and geographical biases and shortcomings (see, for example, Hortal et al., 2015; Hughes et al., 2021; Meyer et al., 2016; or Larsen & Shirey, 2021). These drawbacks, inherent to opportunistically collected historical occurrence data, may limit but not invalidate the use of such information for scientific or conservation purposes (Grand et al., 2007; Isaac et al., 2014; Park, Lyra, et al., 2023; Park, Xie, et al., 2023; van Strien et al., 2013). Different approaches to filtering and processing information from biodiversity databases have allowed taking advantage of this unprecedented source of information to propose explanatory hypotheses about the spatiotemporal distributions of organisms (Belitz et al., 2020; Di Cecco et al., 2023; García‐Roselló et al., 2015; Heberling et al., 2021; Isaac et al., 2014; Lajeunesse & Fourcade, 2023; Pagel et al., 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%