1987
DOI: 10.1038/330116a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial guide stars for adaptive imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the mentioned above concepts lead to the speculation that, provided all these conditions (tuning of spatial and temporal sampling to a restricted volume of atmosphere, large number of references and additional gain introduced by the closed loop operations on a pyramid WFS) are successfully met and combined positively, good sky coverages could be obtained with the usage of NGSs alone, solving istantaneously (as a plus, in case this would be necessary) the tip-tilt indetermination problem (Pilkington 1987;Rigaut & Gendron 1992) and of course all the technical issues of reliability and efficiency related to the massive use of a significant number of artificial reference beacons. This approach is completely different from a previous conjecture (Ragazzoni 1999b) that assumed the global reconstructor MCAO had to be adopted, leading to very large FoVs.…”
Section: The Layer-oriented Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the mentioned above concepts lead to the speculation that, provided all these conditions (tuning of spatial and temporal sampling to a restricted volume of atmosphere, large number of references and additional gain introduced by the closed loop operations on a pyramid WFS) are successfully met and combined positively, good sky coverages could be obtained with the usage of NGSs alone, solving istantaneously (as a plus, in case this would be necessary) the tip-tilt indetermination problem (Pilkington 1987;Rigaut & Gendron 1992) and of course all the technical issues of reliability and efficiency related to the massive use of a significant number of artificial reference beacons. This approach is completely different from a previous conjecture (Ragazzoni 1999b) that assumed the global reconstructor MCAO had to be adopted, leading to very large FoVs.…”
Section: The Layer-oriented Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Projecting a Laser Guide Star (LGS in the following) inside of the isoplanatic patch, as proposed by Foy and Labeyrie (1985), is convenient when correcting the higher order terms of the perturbation, but it must be considered that tilt alone represents nearly 87% of the wavefront phase variance (Noll 1976). The feasibility of using a LGS as a reference source, apart from the problem of focal anisoplanatism (Tallon & Foy 1990), is fundamentally constrained by the tilt indetermination problem (Pilkington 1987). As regard to the latter, it is known that due to reciprocity in the upward and downward path of the projected laser, the tilt of an LGS is almost completely compensated, at least when the telescope has the same diameter of the projector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the tilt or tilts between the emitting laser and the receiving wavefront sensor, the location of the laser spot in the mesosphere is unknown [2].…”
Section: (Lgs)mentioning
confidence: 99%