1982
DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(82)90640-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial erection by perfusion of penile arteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5,7,9 Fresh cadaver studies of artificial erection by perfusion of penile arteries also demonstrated that dorsal penile arteries were adequate to perfuse whole penis through the anastomotic network. 14,15 In our case, however, the dorsal arteries seemed to be unable to perfuse the whole penis. Taylor et al, in their extensive work of vascular territories, described that the adjacent angiosomes were captured through the choke vessels.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…5,7,9 Fresh cadaver studies of artificial erection by perfusion of penile arteries also demonstrated that dorsal penile arteries were adequate to perfuse whole penis through the anastomotic network. 14,15 In our case, however, the dorsal arteries seemed to be unable to perfuse the whole penis. Taylor et al, in their extensive work of vascular territories, described that the adjacent angiosomes were captured through the choke vessels.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Encouraged by this preliminary result, other authors proposed different variations of the technique [29][30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Penile Replantationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We might then confidently infer that the vascular sinusoidal smooth muscle cell system was not compromised by the freezing process, which supports the proposal that the sinusoids are dual venous systems within the corpora cavernosa (Banyan et al, 1989). We believe that our study is novel and will contribute to existing research concerning the hemodynamic response of the human penis (Reiss et al, 1982; Ghalayini, 2004; Ravipati et al, 2007; Komori et al, 2008; Nemark et al, 2008; Prieto, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%