1992
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1759(92)90070-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artifacts and limitations of enzyme immunoassay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various surface effects have been considered as possible explanations for differences in affinities in solid-phase assays [12][13][14]. Coating of protein on microtitre plate wells may change conformation or even lead to denaturation [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various surface effects have been considered as possible explanations for differences in affinities in solid-phase assays [12][13][14]. Coating of protein on microtitre plate wells may change conformation or even lead to denaturation [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test described in this paper detects Ͻ1 ng of small proteins using Dynalbeads, whereas 3-mm-diameter modified glass beads will detect up to 4 g. These levels are sensitive enough to detect and quantify the toxin of interest. However, the test becomes inadequate at higher concentrations because BSA will bind nonspecifically to the beads in addition to specific antibody capture (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may also help to explain the high background level seen in the control. The protein present in the slush tank, which contained whey and other cheese production byproducts, can coat the surface of the modified beads and thus prohibit the interactions between the capture molecule and the target (32). The capture of E. coli O157:H7 in flow with 3-mm-diameter glass beads containing a PEG spacer in two sample types was demonstrated (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods for antigen preparation are important, because denaturation of the tertiary structure of PR3 leads to the loss of epitopes. Coating of proteins onto a solid phase also leads to denaturation of proteins [21], and we therefore developed capture assays to present PR3 in a better preserved form. These seem to work in the expected way, as more IIF-positive sera were positive in the capture assays than in the direct PR3-ANCA ELISA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). A disadvantage of using a capture ELISA with mouse antibody is that some patients may have developed human anti-mouse antibodies, either through such an event as a rodent bite or treatment with MoAb [21]. Another interfering factor producing false-positive results is rheumatoid factors [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%