Artifacts and Incidental Findings Encountered on Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry: Atlas and Analysis

Martineau, Patrick; Bazarjani, Sadri; Zuckier, Lionel S.

doi:10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2015.02.001

Cited by 29 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 125 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, the effects of aortic calcifications on lumbar spine bone mineral density is much discussed the literature, though not universal, most studies reported that vascular calcification have no significant effects on bone mineral density [10]. Cholelithiasis, nephrolithiasis, and calcific leiomyofibroma are frequently seen on DEXA such as porcelain gall bladder, mesenteric calcifications, phleoboliths, and calcinosis cutis [11]. Heterotopic calcification of the hip has been described as causes of apparent increase in bone mineral density [12].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The appearance of pulmonary alveolar microlithiasis on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

Fathala

Alduraibi

2018

The European Research Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan has been widely used as standard method of assessing bone density. Artefacts and incidental findings are frequently encountered on the DEXA scan images, some of which may affect bone mineral density values and the others are only of incidental findings. In this case report, we present a 44-year-old male diagnosed with pulmonary microlithiasis that was confirmed on a transbronchial biopsy. To our knowledge, we report the first case in the literature, describing the appearance of pulmonary alveolar microlithiasis on DEXA scan with brief review of literature on both pulmonary alveolar microlithiasis and artifacts and incidental findings encountered on DEXA scan.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The appearance of pulmonary alveolar microlithiasis on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

Fathala

Alduraibi

2018

The European Research Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Calcific densities lateral to the spine ROIs will lower vertebral BMD by overestimating the density of the adjacent soft tissue, leading to underestimation. 32 In addition to calcifications, metallic densities, either internal or external to the patient, are frequent findings on DXA studies and include bra wires, jewelry, spinal fusion hardware, and other medical devices that can artifactually increase (and occasionally decrease) BMD 33 (Figure 8). The effects of extraneous densities lateral to the spine can be mitigated through the use of software corrections (Figure 9).…”

Section: Interpretation Pitfallsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bone Mineral Densitometry Reporting: Pearls and Pitfalls

2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the method of choice for assessing bone mineral density (BMD). Unfortunately, the performance and interpretation of DXA can be challenging and errors are common. In fact, it has been reported that up to 90% of BMD reports contain at least 1 error. Errors can be the result of technique or interpretative in nature or both and can result in inappropriate diagnosis and management. In this article, we review the various types of pitfalls frequently encountered by physicians interpreting DXA studies. Being aware of these pitfalls will help readers recognize and avoid them when encountered in clinical practice.

show abstract

“…Fractures have a multifactorial etiology. Among the conditions that contribute to increase of fracture are the risk of bone fragility, the tendency of falls and presence of metabolic bone diseases [1] , [2] . Some of these conditions for remain underdiagnosed and undertreated.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In almost all patients with incident fractures, the absolute risk of subsequent fracture and mortality is highest immediately after the occurrence of the fracture. This risk is markedly increased in frail elderly patients [1] . The incidence of fragility fractures is increasing rapidly and has become a major public health concern due to they result in increased mortality and persistent physical morbidity.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Could whole body vibration exercises influence the risk factors for fractures in women with osteoporosis?

Moreira-Marconi

Dionello

Morel

et al. 2016

Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to review the literature about the relevance of the whole body vibration (WBV) in decreasing the number of fractures in osteoporotic women.MethodsSearches were performed by three independent researchers through the PubMed and PEDro databases.ResultsOnly 0.1% of the publications with “Fracture and osteoporosis” have a relation with WBV exercise. The achievements have revealed a positive effect of this exercise in patients with risk factors for fractures like osteoporosis. Protocols were performed two to three times a week, from 6 up to 18 months, and with 12.6 up to 40 Hz as frequencies. Different tools were used to evaluate the effects of the WBV exercise in conditions that could cause fractures in postmenopausal women.ConclusionsAlthough the paucity of research regarding direct effects of WBV in decreasing fractures, WBV could be a feasible and effective way to modify well-recognized risk factors for falls and fractures, improvements in some aspects of neuromuscular function and balance. More studies have to be performed establish protocols with well controlled parameters.

show abstract

Artifacts and Incidental Findings Encountered on Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry: Atlas and Analysis

Cited by 29 publications

References 125 publications

The appearance of pulmonary alveolar microlithiasis on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

The appearance of pulmonary alveolar microlithiasis on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

Bone Mineral Densitometry Reporting: Pearls and Pitfalls

Could whole body vibration exercises influence the risk factors for fractures in women with osteoporosis?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About