2005
DOI: 10.1109/lsp.2005.855539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artifact removal from electroencephalograms using a hybrid BSS-SVM algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
98
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
98
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Approaches such as trial rejection, eye fixation, EOG subtraction, principal component analysis (PCA) [3], blind source separation (BSS) using ICA [4]- [6], spatial [7], and H ∞ [8] adaptive filters have also been documented as having varying success. Despite no quantitative comparison for any reference dataset being available, it has been shown that the regression-and BSS-based methods are the most reliable ones [1], [2], [4]- [6].…”
Section: Removal Of the Eye-blink Artifacts From Eegs Via Stf-ts Modementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Approaches such as trial rejection, eye fixation, EOG subtraction, principal component analysis (PCA) [3], blind source separation (BSS) using ICA [4]- [6], spatial [7], and H ∞ [8] adaptive filters have also been documented as having varying success. Despite no quantitative comparison for any reference dataset being available, it has been shown that the regression-and BSS-based methods are the most reliable ones [1], [2], [4]- [6].…”
Section: Removal Of the Eye-blink Artifacts From Eegs Via Stf-ts Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major advantage of the proposed method is that unlike the respective regression-and BSS-based methods presented in [2] and [4], it needs neither the reference EOG channel recordings nor any objective criterion for distinguishing between EB and spurious peaks in the ongoing EEGs. Reducing the computational complexity in the estimation of the STF model using the PARAFAC is achievable by subdividing the time domain into a number of segments, and a four-way array is then set to estimate the STF-time/segment (TS) model of the data using the four-way PARAFAC.…”
Section: Removal Of the Eye-blink Artifacts From Eegs Via Stf-ts Modementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is well known that the enormous indeterminacies in brain make the BSS problem ill-posed; however, statistical natures lead to restoring the well-posedness of the problem in a biosignal processing. By the properties, theoretically multivariate statistical analysis approaches like independent component analysis (ICA) can separate observed EEG signals into spatially and temporally distinguishable components effectively, and then, estimated components will be identified as neuronal or artifactual sources by hard/soft threshold to reconstruct artifact-free EEG matrix [10,11]. Whereas there are several reviews on artifact rejection methods including overall procedure (signal separation, component identification, and signal reconstruction) for multi-channel EEG signals [12][13][14][15][16], we have never seen review of artifact rejection methods for single-channel EEG signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches such as trial rejection, eye fixation, EOG subtraction, principal component analysis (PCA) [3], blind source separation (BSS) using ICA [4], [5], and H ∞ [6] adaptive filters have also been documented as having varying success. Despite no quantitative comparison for any reference dataset being available, it has been shown that the regression-and BSS-based methods are the most reliable ones [1], [2], [4], and [5]. Although beamforming-based methods have been recently utilized in the EEG source localization problem [7], to the authors' best knowledge, they have not been considered in removing the EB artifacts from the EEGs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%