2019
DOI: 10.1364/ol.44.001273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artifact-free imaging through a bone-like layer by using an ultrasonic-guided photoacoustic microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some methods have been reported to reduce the reflection artifacts induced by acoustic reflection layers. [33][34][35][36][37] By mimicking PA wave fields using an US wave, the artifacts of the optical absorbers above the one-layer-reflector are reduced in a PA tomography. [33,34] Convolutional neural network has also been trained to locate both sources and reflection artifacts, and suppress the artifacts in the PA channel data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some methods have been reported to reduce the reflection artifacts induced by acoustic reflection layers. [33][34][35][36][37] By mimicking PA wave fields using an US wave, the artifacts of the optical absorbers above the one-layer-reflector are reduced in a PA tomography. [33,34] Convolutional neural network has also been trained to locate both sources and reflection artifacts, and suppress the artifacts in the PA channel data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[36] Also, our previous work presented an US-guided PAM to reduce the reflection artifacts induced by a bone-like layer. [37] However, the problem of artifacts induced by multilayered media above the optical absorbers in PAM has not been well addressed. Multilayered scattering is still a significant factor that restricts the performance of brain imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The skull bone has much higher acoustic impedance than soft tissue. A severe acoustic impedance mismatch could cause amplitude and phase distortion, and decrease the resolution and contrast of the transcranial imaging, significantly reducing the brain image quality [19][20][21][22]. Traditional approaches to overcome the limitation of acoustic scattering have mostly relied on a priori knowledge of the properties of tissue inhomogeneity or need to involve additional acoustic measurements, evidenced in the statistical reconstruction method [23], coherence factor optimization [24], and the interferometry method [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PAM can provide a resolution of micron-scale level with a penetration depth of up to one millimeter (optical-resolution PAM, OR-PAM), [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] or a resolution of a few tens or hundreds of microns with a penetration depth of a few millimeters (acoustic-resolution PAM, AR-PAM). [9][10][11][12][13][14] Moreover, PAM has rich optical absorption contrasts and good bio-safety. These merits promise PAM great potentials in biomedical imaging such as in vivo brain monitoring, 9,[15][16][17] cancer detection, 18,19) microvasculature visualization, 5,20) endometriosis imaging, 21) cell imaging, 22,23) oxygen saturation measurement, 2,9,24) and so on.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 illustrates the experimental setup of AR-PAM, where a spherically focused US transducer (V375-SU, Olympus Corp.) with a central frequency of 30 MHz, a focal length of ∼19 mm, a diameter of 6.3 mm, and a −6 dB bandwidth of 78.3% was used to detect the photoacoustic signals. The imaging system has a lateral resolution of about 180 µm 14) and was used to imaging the phantom made of agar and four hairs in different depths. Due to the low laser energy used in the experiment, the detected photoacoustic signals are weak and noise is relatively strong.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%