1999
DOI: 10.1006/brcg.1998.1086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Articulatory Consequences of Parkinson's Disease: Perspectives from Two Modalities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rationale to use this test stands on the fact that motor deficits in the speech capabilities of PD individuals manifest themselves more strongly under circumstances requiring motor planning and execution over extended sequences of motor production (i.e., when a single sequence is repeated several times or cases in which a given fragment occurs within a sentence context). Compensation for PD results in a simplification of the articulation at the expense of ease of processing [ 55 ], revealing important cues about speech production from the motoric point of view, even when the DDK task is simpler in motor terms than the speech taken from more natural language data (i.e. conversational speech).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rationale to use this test stands on the fact that motor deficits in the speech capabilities of PD individuals manifest themselves more strongly under circumstances requiring motor planning and execution over extended sequences of motor production (i.e., when a single sequence is repeated several times or cases in which a given fragment occurs within a sentence context). Compensation for PD results in a simplification of the articulation at the expense of ease of processing [ 55 ], revealing important cues about speech production from the motoric point of view, even when the DDK task is simpler in motor terms than the speech taken from more natural language data (i.e. conversational speech).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite of its simplicity, this task reveals some cues about the speaker’s ability to produce the speech with an adequate rate, and to evaluate syllable-to-syllable stability or subphonemic durations [ 55 ]. In this sense, the syllable rates of the DDK test are used as an indicator to evaluate the patient’s ability to rapidly alternate speech movements [ 54 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dopamine plays an important role in motor tasks, and its absence or decrease affects the coordination, velocity, and acceleration of movements. Speech production involves the movement and coordination of multiple articulators and, consequently, it is affected by PD, that causes dysphonia and dysarthria (in particular hypokinetic dysarthria) in patients [1,2,3]. Dysphonia can be defined as the incapacity of the subject to produce a normal voiced sound, while dysarthria is more related to problems in articulation during the pronunciation of words.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both ASR systems, the deletion and insertion rates tend to be higher in patients than in controls and affect more characters/phonetic units. This effect is related with the changes associated with the patient's motor functions that, for instance, can affect the onset and offset of the glottal source, the breathing control, and longer vowel duration (slow speech) combined with occasional rushes of fast speech [2], deriving in insertions and deletions. Similarly, Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PP are subject to dysprosody and show less variability in the fundamental frequency and intensity and more speech velocity and pausing abnormalities than control subjects (CS) 6 14 17…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%