2014
DOI: 10.1044/2014_jslhr-s-12-0395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Articulatory and Acoustic Correlates of Contrastive Focus in Congenitally Blind Adults and Sighted Adults

Abstract: These results suggest that implementation of prosodic focus is affected by congenital visual deprivation. The authors discuss how these findings can be interpreted in the framework of the perception-for-action-control theory.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
7
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This pattern was also found in our previous studies of speech production in blind speakers [16,17,23]. Furthermore, as expected, vowels produced in the fast speech condition were significantly shorter than those produced in the normal speech condition (F[1,17] = 68.75; p < 0.01; η 2 = 0.79).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This pattern was also found in our previous studies of speech production in blind speakers [16,17,23]. Furthermore, as expected, vowels produced in the fast speech condition were significantly shorter than those produced in the normal speech condition (F[1,17] = 68.75; p < 0.01; η 2 = 0.79).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…These results can be interpreted in the light of the multimodal cues that speakers transmit to their perceivers while they move their lips and jaw during speech production. We have reported elsewhere [17,23] that visible articulatory gestures (lip and jaw movements) are more heavily weighted in the phonological representations of sighted speakers, compared to their blind peers. When required to enhance distinctiveness, such as in a clear speech condition, sighted speakers increase the amplitude of lip and jaw movements more than blind speakers, presumably to enhance audiovisual perceptual saliency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in identification slopes likely suggests that sighted speakers display finer abilities to perceptually follow the decreasing values of the frication noise, compared to blind speakers, in this specific set of syllables. In blind speakers, the reduced ability to perceptually follow the falling movement of the frication noise may be the consequence, at the perceptual level, of a limited control in producing the rounding gesture, a visually and auditory cued gesture [10,12,13]. Also, this might suggest that, in relating F2 changes to their perceptual consequences, sighted speakers have acquired more categorical representations because they have associated some of these changes with lip rounding gestures that are visible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were Quebec French congenitally blind adults who had taken part in previous speech perception and production experiments conducted in our laboratory [10,12,13]. Age-matched sighted adults were also tested.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SonoSite 180 Plus ultrasound system was used to synchronously record the articulatory values. This non-invasive technique has been shown to be very suitable for phonetic studies, since it provides a view of the global tongue contour in the mid-sagittal or coronal plane (Ménard et al, 2012;Ménard, Perrier, & Aubin, 2013;Ménard, Leclerc, & Tiede, 2014). A head-probe stabilisation system was used to prevent head movements relative to the ultrasound probe (Articulate Instruments Ltd., East Lothian, UK).…”
Section: Materials and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%