Silbenschnitt Und Tonakzente 2002
DOI: 10.1515/9783110916447.129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Articulatory analysis of the German vowel system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
47
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
7
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence, the word duration increases with increasing number of consonants, displaying clearly that [1]'s and [2]'s assumptions on a stable overall duration of the CV sequences and with this, a stable word duration is not compatible with the data we found. Furthermore, we found that long vowels are more prone to shortening than short vowels, replicating the findings of [18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…As a consequence, the word duration increases with increasing number of consonants, displaying clearly that [1]'s and [2]'s assumptions on a stable overall duration of the CV sequences and with this, a stable word duration is not compatible with the data we found. Furthermore, we found that long vowels are more prone to shortening than short vowels, replicating the findings of [18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The spatial extent of the flanking gestures and of the lingual gestures associated with vowel production is greater for long compared to short vowels (Beňuš, 2011). Interestingly, Hoole and Mooshammer (2002) report a greater spatial extent of the lingual gestures for tense German vowels compared to their lax cognates but only for central and back vowels; quantity does not influence the extent for more articulatorily constrained front vowels.…”
Section: Articulation Of Geminatesmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This property led to the suggestion that lax vowels are incompressible (Klatt 1973) or -according to Trubetzkoy (1938) -that lax vowels lack the ability to stretch (Dehnungsfähigkeit). For example, in Mooshammer & Fuchs (2002) and Hoole & Mooshammer (2002) we showed that the tongue tip distances travelled during unstressed /tVt/ sequences with lax nuclei were reduced to such an extent that the spatial reduction could not be attributed to shorter durations because their temporal reduction was too subtle. For example, in Mooshammer & Fuchs (2002) and Hoole & Mooshammer (2002) we showed that the tongue tip distances travelled during unstressed /tVt/ sequences with lax nuclei were reduced to such an extent that the spatial reduction could not be attributed to shorter durations because their temporal reduction was too subtle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…What makes the German vowel inventory interesting is the fact that in earlier studies (Mooshammer, Fuchs & Fischer 1999, Geng & Mooshammer 2000, Hoole & Mooshammer 2002, Mooshammer & Fuchs 2002 it was found that only tense vowels were significantly shortened in unstressed position or due to a faster speech rate while the duration of lax vowels was kept almost constant with very slight vowel shortening. This property led to the suggestion that lax vowels are incompressible (Klatt 1973) or -according to Trubetzkoy (1938) -that lax vowels lack the ability to stretch (Dehnungsfähigkeit).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%