Articulation of Native Cartilage Against Different Femoral Component Materials. Oxidized Zirconium Damages Cartilage Less Than Cobalt-Chrome

Vanlommel, Jan; Corte, Ronny De; Luyckx, Jean Philippe; Anderson, Melissa L.; Labey, Luc; Bellemans, Johan

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.024

Cited by 12 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These types of implants are composed of stiff impermeable materials, in which lubrication regimes are distinct from those in cartilage. The clinical success of these interventions depends largely on the friction between implant surface and opposing cartilage, and associated wear [22]. Surprisingly, no studies were published in which the influence of the mentioned SF components were explored with a cartilage-CoCrMo interface in direct comparison with a cartilage-cartilage interface.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Proteoglycan 4 reduces friction more than other synovial fluid components for both cartilage-cartilage and cartilage-metal articulation

Damen

Donkelaar

Cardinaels

et al. 2021

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Proteoglycan 4 reduces friction more than other synovial fluid components for both cartilage-cartilage and cartilage-metal articulation

Damen

Donkelaar

Cardinaels

et al. 2021

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The revision rates could be negatively affected by including studies that did not perform patellar resurfacing at their primary TKA procedures (14,33). The need for patellar resurfacing after TKA can be caused by anterior knee pain and progressive osteoarthritis.…”

Section: Metal Hypersensitivitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Metal wear debris generation in primary total knee arthroplasty: is it an issue?

Kellens¹,

Berger²,

Vandenneucker³

2021

Acta Orthop Belg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

More durable total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) are needed, due to the rising life expectancy, the higher activity levels of patients and the growing concerns about aseptic loosening being caused by metal hypersensitivity. In response, different hypoallergenic metal coatings have been developed for TKAs. How- ever, possible adverse effects of these different metals (cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, zirconium, titanium and tantalum) have been neglected. The aim was to summarize the local and systemic adverse effects (including metal hypersensitivity), survival ratios, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and the plasma metal ion concentrations of the different TKA coatings. A literature search on PubMed and EMBASE was performed. In total, 15 studies were found eligible. Common adverse effects of TKA were infection, loosening, pain, instability and hyper- coagulation disorders. Serious adverse effects related to TKA implants were not reported. The survival ratios and patient-reported outcome measures seem to confirm these good results. In contrast with chromium and cobalt, no significant differences were reported in the nickel, molybdenum and titanium concentrations. No significant differences between the hypoallergenic and standard TKA implants were found in terms of adverse effects, survival ratios and PROMs. A causal relationship between the common adverse effects and the different metals is unlikely. Due to the heterogeneity of the TKA implants used, no firm conclusions could be made. Further research with longer follow-up studies are needed to find possible adverse effects and differences. Thus far, the hypoallergenic implants seem to perform equal to the standard implants.

show abstract

“…The results showed that the form was mainly abrasive wear. Vanlommel et al [8] compared the damage of porcine patellar cartilage by OxZr and CoCr, and the results showed that both implants could cause cartilage surface degradation. Wimmer et al [6] evaluated the effect of an alumina-zirconia composite (AZC) as a joint interface against living cartilage graft, and compared with clinicalrelated CoCrMo; AZC induced less cell and tissue damage than CoCrMo.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bio-tribological behavior of articular cartilage based on biological morphology

Zhang

Chen

et al. 2021

J Mater Sci: Mater Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Artificial hemiarthroplasty is one of the effective methods for the treatment of hip joint diseases, but the wear failure of the interface between the hemi hip joint material and articular cartilage restricts the life of the prosthesis. Therefore, it is important to explore the damage mechanism between the interfaces to prolong the life of the prosthesis and improve the life quality of the prosthesis replacement. In this paper, the creep and bio-tribological properties of cartilage against PEEK, CoCrMo alloy, and ceramic were studied, and the tribological differences between “hard–soft” and “soft–soft” contact were analyzed based on biomorphology. The results showed that with the increase of time in vitro, the thickness of the cartilage membrane decreased, the surface damage was aggravated, and the anti-creep ability of cartilage was weakened. Second, the creep resistance of the soft–soft contact pair was better than that of the hard–soft contact pair. Also, the greater the load and the longer the wear time, the more serious the cartilage damage. Among the three friction pairs, the cartilage in PEEK/articular cartilage was the least damaged, followed by CoCrMo alloy/articular cartilage, and the most damage was found in ceramic/articular, indicating that the soft–soft friction pair inflicted the least damage to the cartilage.

show abstract

Articulation of Native Cartilage Against Different Femoral Component Materials. Oxidized Zirconium Damages Cartilage Less Than Cobalt-Chrome

Cited by 12 publications

References 27 publications

Proteoglycan 4 reduces friction more than other synovial fluid components for both cartilage-cartilage and cartilage-metal articulation

Proteoglycan 4 reduces friction more than other synovial fluid components for both cartilage-cartilage and cartilage-metal articulation

Metal wear debris generation in primary total knee arthroplasty: is it an issue?

Bio-tribological behavior of articular cartilage based on biological morphology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About