2016
DOI: 10.1111/cgf.13076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Articulated‐Motion‐Aware Sparse Localized Decomposition

Abstract: Compactly representing time‐varying geometries is an important issue in dynamic geometry processing. This paper proposes a framework of sparse localized decomposition for given animated meshes by analyzing the variation of edge lengths and dihedral angles (LAs) of the meshes. It first computes the length and dihedral angle of each edge for poses and then evaluates the difference (residuals) between the LAs of an arbitrary pose and their counterparts in a reference one. Performing sparse localized decomposition… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although for the horse dataset, the method [24] has an error equal to 29.6090 and 20.1994 in [21], 18.0624 in [23], 12.9605 in [25], and 7.3682 in [20], compared to 6.4412 in our work. It is clear that the obtained error rate is so reduced and the performance of a MA on the synthesised mesh allows to minimise the resolution without losing the initial data, reaching the control mesh.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although for the horse dataset, the method [24] has an error equal to 29.6090 and 20.1994 in [21], 18.0624 in [23], 12.9605 in [25], and 7.3682 in [20], compared to 6.4412 in our work. It is clear that the obtained error rate is so reduced and the performance of a MA on the synthesised mesh allows to minimise the resolution without losing the initial data, reaching the control mesh.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…We use the ERMS generalisation ability error (root mean square) to ensure the comparison on the set of tests of our method with several state‐of‐the‐art methods, including original sparse localised deformation component (SPLOCS) [20], SPLOCS with deformation gradients [23], SPLOCS with edge lengths and dihedral angles [24], SPLOCS with the feature from [21], and mesh‐based autoencoders for localised deformation component analysis [25].…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, this work cannot cope with rotations larger than 180 • due to the limitation of deformation gradients. Wang et al [38] extend [36] using rotation invariant features based on [6], and hence have a similar limitation when extrapolation of examples is required. Different from these works [36], [37], [38] which explore sparsity to localize deformation components, our method instead introduces sparse promoting regularization which prefers fewer basis modes for representing deformed shapes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%