1989
DOI: 10.3928/0147-7447-19890301-09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arthroscopy in Diagnosis and Treatment of Hip Disorders

Abstract: Fourteen hip arthroscopies between January 1985 and May 1988 were reviewed. Included were ten women and four men with an age ranging from 12 to 76 years. Indications were avascular necrosis; loose bodies; osteoarthrosis, arthritis, or pain; and snapping hip. The diagnosis was verified in five cases, including arthroscopic removal of a loose body in one and resection of a plica bridging the space between the femoral head and acetabular roof in two patients. The diagnosis was rejected in three cases. In five cas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8) The extraction of loose debris from total hip replacements [18]. 9) The beneficial resection of a plica has been reported in two patients [6]. 10) Even the retrieval of a bullet from the hip joint has been reported [10].…”
Section: Therapeuticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8) The extraction of loose debris from total hip replacements [18]. 9) The beneficial resection of a plica has been reported in two patients [6]. 10) Even the retrieval of a bullet from the hip joint has been reported [10].…”
Section: Therapeuticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hip arthroscopy was described as early as 1939 by Takagi 32 ; nonetheless, early uses were limited to diagnostic visualization, loose body removal, and chondrolabral debridement. 4,17,32,33 Increased understanding of hip pathologies alongside advancements in surgical tools and techniques have contributed to the rapid expansion of indications and applications for hip arthroscopy. With this growth has come an influx of literature describing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and native hip survivorship after hip arthroscopy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%