Arthroscopy for Knee Osteoarthritis Has Not Decreased After a Clinical Trial

Abstract

Background Multiple clinical trials have shown that arthroscopy for knee osteoarthritis is not efficacious. It is unclear how these studies have affected orthopaedic practice in the USA. Questions/purposes We questioned whether, in the Veterans Health Administration system, rates of knee arthroscopy in patients with osteoarthritis have changed after publication of the initial clinical trial by Moseley et al. in 2002, and whether rates of arthroplasty within 2 years of arthroscopy have changed during the same period.Methods Patients 50 years and older with knee osteoarthritis who underwent arthroscopy between 1998 and 2010 were retrospectively identified and an annual arthroscopy rate was calculated from 1998 through 2002 and from 2006 through 2010. Patients who underwent knee arthroplasty within 2 years of arthroscopy during each period were identified, and a 2-year conversion to arthroplasty rate was calculated. Results Between 1998 and 2002, the annual arthroscopy rate decreased from 4% to 3%. Of these arthroscopies, 4% were converted to arthroplasty within 2 years. Between 2006 and 2010, the annual arthroscopy rate increased from 3% to 4%. Of these arthroscopies, 5% were converted to arthroplasty within 2 years. Conclusions Rates of arthroscopy in patients with knee osteoarthritis and conversion to arthroplasty within 2 years have not decreased with time. It may be that evidence alone is not sufficient to alter practice patterns or that arthroscopy rates for arthritis for patients in the Veterans Health Administration system were already so low that the results of the initial clinical trial had no substantial effect. Level of Evidence Level III, Retrospective cohort study.

Quantifying low-value care: a patient-centric versus service-centric lens

“…Patient-indication measures have a denominator including only patients that had the potential to receive the service. For example, a cohort of patients with osteoarthritis with a knee arthroscopy rate of 4% is a patient-indication measure since only patients with osteoarthritis are included in the denominator 11. A patient-population measure denominator includes the entire cohort, such as the result reported by Schwartz, et al, 12 where the percentage of all Medicare beneficiaries with both a knee arthroscopy and osteoarthritis diagnosis was 0.2%.…”

Poor overall quality of clinical practice guidelines for musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review

“…Shoulder arthroscopy rates have increased by 55% between 2001 and 2013 despite a lack of supporting evidence 8. In the US Veterans Health Administration system, 4% of individuals with knee osteoarthritis undergo knee arthroscopy annually, although there is limited clinical benefit 9. These practices are problematic because at best they represent ineffective, expensive and inefficient care, and at worst, they serve to increase the burden of MSK pain.…”

Value-based Healthcare: The Challenge of Identifying and Addressing Low-value Interventions

“…Despite increased emphasis on evidence-based medicine in both training and practice, and growing awareness of the need for good stewardship of healthcare resources, the use of these low-value orthopaedic interventions continues. Spending on viscosupplementation continues to grow [15,23], the rate of knee arthroscopy in patients with osteoarthritis has remained stable in the Veterans Administration system [2], and complex spinal fusion rates among patients with Medicare have increased markedly [11].…”