2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arthroscopic revision of Bankart repair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
57
1
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
57
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This percentage represents a poorer outcome than the paper by Kim, who found 21% of recurrence after revision surgery 25,26 and also an higher percentage of failure than the studies by Neri and Creighton (27% of recurrence in repeated procedures) 27,28 , by Franceschi (10% of recurrence) 16 or Barnes (6% of recurrence) 29 . The difference in outcomes can be related to the fact that the present study is the first in the literature considering also the residual apprehension as a failure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…This percentage represents a poorer outcome than the paper by Kim, who found 21% of recurrence after revision surgery 25,26 and also an higher percentage of failure than the studies by Neri and Creighton (27% of recurrence in repeated procedures) 27,28 , by Franceschi (10% of recurrence) 16 or Barnes (6% of recurrence) 29 . The difference in outcomes can be related to the fact that the present study is the first in the literature considering also the residual apprehension as a failure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Good or excellent results were found in 19 patients, while a return to the preopera- tive level of activity was achieved in 18 patients. Neri et al [5] followed up with 11 patients after arthroscopic revision Bankart repair. Eight patients showed good to excellent results, whilst subluxation or dislocation occurred in three cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, revision surgery in these cases has been undertaken by an open approach, although arthroscopic revision appears to be technically possible in many cases and hypothetically provides potential for an expedited recovery owing to less surgical morbidity [5]. Whether the results of initial arthroscopic stabilization differ from those of arthroscopic revision surgery is still not entirely clarified [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esses autores observaram média de 89,1 pontos utilizando classificação de Rowe modificada (22) . Nere et al, analisando 11 pacientes, encontraram índice de Rowe de 74,5 (variando de 35 a 100 pontos) (23) . Larrain et al descreveram 91,8% de resultados bons-excelentes segundo Rowe (24) .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Neri et al encontraram índice de resultados segundo a UCLA de 29,6 pontos (variando de 24 a 35), com resultados bons-excelentes em oito pacientes (72,7%) e razoáveis e ruins em três (27,3%) (23) .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified