Arthroscopic Latarjet procedure

Lafosse, Laurent; Boyle, Simon

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2009.12.010

Cited by 286 publications

(192 citation statements)

References 18 publications

(15 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

177

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Butt and Charalambous reviewed the literature and reported 10.1% of nonunion and 1.6% of osteolysis after open procedure [25]. In arthroscopic technique the rate of graft healing problems varied from 7%: four non-unions and three graft osteolysis in the study of Lafosse and Boyle [4] to 22% reported by Casabianca et al [29]. The opposite statement was found about partial graft osteolysis: it was significantly more frequent in ARTHRO than OPEN group: respectively 32 (53.3%) versus ten (23.8%).…”

Section: Radiographic Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition, in the arthroscopic group, the final decision on Latarjet stabilisation was undertaken second to a glenohumeral joint inspection in regard to anterior soft tissue quality and an engagement of HillSachs lesion: anterior glenoid rim and Hill-Sachs lesion contact or dislocation in an Bapprehention position^of 90°of abduction and external rotation, according to Bon track/off track^hypothesis [7]. All open procedures were performed according to a technique described by Walch [8], whereas all arthroscopic procedure according to Lafosse's last modification technique, using specific arthroscopic instruments (DePuy, Mitek, Johnson& Johnson) [4,9], in beach chair position under general anesthesia and interscalene block (Fig. 1).…”

Section: Surgical Techniquementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Walch reported a 1% recurrence rate which was amongst the best of results published [3]. In 2007 Lafosse described the arthroscopic technique of Latarjet stabilisation and in 2010, he reported the first 100 case results with 0% of recurrence [4]. From this moment onwards, the number of surgeons performing arthroscopic stabilisation has gradually increased and the discussion about superiority of one procedure or another has arisen.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Comparative study of open and arthroscopic coracoid transfer for shoulder anterior instability (Latarjet)—clinical results at short term follow-up

Kordasiewicz¹,

Małachowski²,

Kiciński³

et al. 2016

International Orthopaedics (SICOT)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Results Average time of surgery was significantly shorter in ARTHRO than OPEN: respectively 110 and 120 minutes. The number of intra-operative complications was six (12.5%) in OPEN and five (8.1%) in ARTHRO. The results were comparable in both groups, with no significant difference between OPEN and ARTHRO group: satisfaction rate -96.8% and 91.9%, shoulder function -92.2% and 90%, Walch-Duplay score -83.9 and 76.7 respecively. A significant difference was reported in Rowe score: 87.8 in OPEN and 78.9 in ARTHRO. Another significant difference was found in the presence of Bsubjective apprehension^-a term referring to the subjective perception of instability with no signs of instability at clinical examination -28.7% in OPEN and 50% in ARTHRO. Range of motion in both groups were comparable, however patients in OPEN had significantly lower loss of external rotation in adduction to the side comparing to the contralateral shoulder: 7°versus 14°in ARTHRO. Recurrence was reported in three cases in each group: 6.2% in OPEN and 4.8% in ARTHRO. A revision surgery was performed in four patients (9.3%) in OPEN and six (9.7%) in ARTHRO. Radiographic evaluation showed a significantly lower rate (5%) of graft healing problems (fracture, non-union and osteolysis) after arthroscopic stabilisation, however a partial osteolysis of the proximal part of the bone block was significantly more frequent (53.5%). Conclusions The arthroscopic Latarjet stabilisation showed satisfactory and comparable results to open procedure. We recommend further investigation and development of arthroscopic technique.Level of evidence: III

show abstract

Section: Radiographic Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Surgical Techniquementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparative study of open and arthroscopic coracoid transfer for shoulder anterior instability (Latarjet)—clinical results at short term follow-up

Kordasiewicz¹,

Małachowski²,

Kiciński³

et al. 2016

International Orthopaedics (SICOT)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…18.9 , 18.10 , and 18.11 ) [ 3 , 18 ]. These techniques combine the advantages of a bony augmentation and minimally invasive arthroscopy [ 17 ].…”

Section: Operative Treatmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability: Part II. Bony Bankart – Small Versus Large Lesions

Lafosse¹,

Fogerty

Rosso

2015

Sports Injuries to the Shoulder and Elbow

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Die ersten klinischen Ergebnisse sind vielversprechend. Lafosse und Boyle [54] berichten über ausschließlich gute und sehr gute Ergebnisse ohne Reluxation in ihrer Gruppe. Einschränkend sei jedoch auf die limitierte Wiederfindungsrate der Studie von lediglich 35% hingewiesen.…”

Section: Großer Knochenverlust (Erosiv)unclassified

Die ossäre Bankart-Läsion

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fractures of the anteroinferior glenoid rim, termed bony Bankart lesions, have been reported to occur in up to 22% of first time anterior shoulder dislocations. The primary goal of treatment is to create a stable glenohumeral joint and a good shoulder function. Options for therapeutic intervention are largely dependent on the chronicity of the lesion, the activity level of the patient and postreduction fracture characteristics, such as the size, location and number of fracture fragments. Non-operative treatment can be successful for small, acute fractures, which are anatomically reduced after shoulder reduction. However, in patients with a high risk profile for recurrent instability initial Bankart repair is recommended. Additionally, bony fixation is recommended for acute fractures that involve more than 15-20% of the inferior glenoid diameter. On the other hand chronic fractures are generally managed on a case-by-case basis depending on the amount of fragment resorption and bony erosion of the anterior glenoid with high recurrence rates under conservative therapy. When significant bone loss of the anterior glenoid is present, anatomical (e.g. iliac crest bone graft and osteoarticular allograft) or non-anatomical (e.g. Latarjet and Bristow) reconstruction of the anterior glenoid is often indicated.

show abstract

Arthroscopic Latarjet procedure

Cited by 286 publications

References 18 publications

Comparative study of open and arthroscopic coracoid transfer for shoulder anterior instability (Latarjet)—clinical results at short term follow-up

Comparative study of open and arthroscopic coracoid transfer for shoulder anterior instability (Latarjet)—clinical results at short term follow-up

Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability: Part II. Bony Bankart – Small Versus Large Lesions

Die ossäre Bankart-Läsion

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About