2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.11.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arthroscopic Ankle Arthrodesis: A 2-15 Year Follow-up Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis (AAA) for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis (OA) has been gaining popularity since it was first introduced in 1983. 2,5,13,17 Although many studies have reported that ankles with more than 15-degree deformity are contraindicated for AAA, 12,18 it has increasingly been performed in more varus-deformed ankle OA in recent years. 1,4,19 The importance of appropriate alignment of the ankle arthrodesis for long-term clinical success has been reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis (AAA) for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis (OA) has been gaining popularity since it was first introduced in 1983. 2,5,13,17 Although many studies have reported that ankles with more than 15-degree deformity are contraindicated for AAA, 12,18 it has increasingly been performed in more varus-deformed ankle OA in recent years. 1,4,19 The importance of appropriate alignment of the ankle arthrodesis for long-term clinical success has been reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FFI score improved from a mean of 87 (range, 78-93) to 24 (range, [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. The mean VAS score improved from 8 (range, 7-9) to 2 (range, 1-3) at final follow-up (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50,76,117 Reported nonunion rates ranged from 0% to 36%, averaging around 8% with open techniques, with more recent series showing better results according to a recent review. 128 Many modern series tend to focus on arthroscopic fusions, which have demonstrated improved fusion rates and lower complications 34,56,93 and better functional outcomes. 122 A recent systematic review demonstrated improved clinical outcome scores, lower complication rates, lower length of hospital stay and lower blood loss with arthroscopic fusions compared to open fusions; however, union rate, reoperation rate, and surgical time were similar.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%