2015
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a4291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arterial Spin-Labeling Parameters Influence Signal Variability and Estimated Regional Relative Cerebral Blood Flow in Normal Aging and Mild Cognitive Impairment: FAIR versus PICORE Techniques

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Arterial spin-labeling is a noninvasive method to map cerebral blood flow, which might be useful for early diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases. We directly compared 2 arterial spin-labeling techniques in healthy elderly controls and individuals with mild cognitive impairment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…61). Arterial Spin Labelling MR offers a non invasive method to assess Cerebral Blood Flow and is an emerging biomarker for MCI and AD62. Diminished CBF reduces brain supply of oxygen, energy substrates and nutrients, impairs the clearance of neurotoxic molecules, and this is known to contribute to neuronal dysfunction found in neurodegenerative disorders, which are of early appearance in Medial Temporal Lobe regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…61). Arterial Spin Labelling MR offers a non invasive method to assess Cerebral Blood Flow and is an emerging biomarker for MCI and AD62. Diminished CBF reduces brain supply of oxygen, energy substrates and nutrients, impairs the clearance of neurotoxic molecules, and this is known to contribute to neuronal dysfunction found in neurodegenerative disorders, which are of early appearance in Medial Temporal Lobe regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PASL showed higher CBF in the posterior circulation, cerebellum, and basal ganglia and lower CBF in the frontal lobe whereas BS 3D PCASL had an exactly opposite distribution. Although much of this difference can be attributed to the different labeling and acquisition schemes [Lovblad et al, ], differences in effective PLD and their mismatch with ATT also likely contributed. ATT can be measured experimentally, and would be highly beneficial for optimal accuracy in CBF quantification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method converts each correlation coefficient into a z ‐score using Fisher's r ‐to‐ z transformation, computes the asymptotic covariance of the estimates, and subsequently uses the quantities in an asymptotic z ‐test. We also compared the regional distribution of CBF between the three modalities based on the control subjects, as prior studies—e.g., Lovblad et al []—showed that differences in labeling can lead to regional variability and difference in signal intensity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%